Skip to main content

Security report for ocspektrum.cz

OC Spektrum, s.r.o. · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OC Spektrum, s.r.o. operates a medium-sized shopping center in the Czech Republic, offering a variety of retail shops, restaurants, and parking facilities. The website presents a professional and user-friendly interface with clear navigation and relevant content targeting general shoppers and local visitors. The business holds recognized certifications such as BREEAM In USE and has received industry awards, reinforcing its market credibility. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries, cookie consent management, and Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and privacy compliance evident through comprehensive cookie and privacy policies. However, explicit security headers and incident response information are absent, representing areas for improvement. Overall, the site is safe, trustworthy, and well-maintained, with no signs of malicious activity or content blocking.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ocspektrum.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The shopping center targets local consumers and visitors seeking retail and dining experiences. Its business model revolves around leasing retail spaces and hosting events to attract foot traffic. The presence of certifications and awards suggests a competitive positioning in the commercial retail sector. The website's integration with social media platforms and partner organizations indicates a collaborative ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include tenant rents, event sponsorships, and parking fees. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site may reflect a preference for centralized contact through web forms or physical visits. Growth indicators include active event promotion and digital engagement via Instagram and Facebook.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content, and third-party scripts appear standard and reputable. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No published security policy or incident response contacts were found, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and mitigation. The site does not appear to use a security.txt file or disclose vulnerability disclosure procedures. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with contact details for vulnerability reporting.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate responsible disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OC Spektrum, s.r.o.
Description
OC Spektrum is a shopping center offering 17 shops, 7 restaurants and cafes, and 136 parking spaces. It hosts various events and promotions and provides a map and contact information for visitors.
Key services
Retail shops, Restaurants and cafes, Parking facilities, Event hosting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Google Tag Manager, Cookies Giant Consent Management, Flickity Slider, Google Maps API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookies Giant Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection or registry policy.
  4. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools responsibly.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active and linked.
  7. Certifications and awards enhance trust and credibility.
  8. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML source.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; site is family-friendly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5, leveraging libraries such as Flickity for sliders and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Cookie consent is managed by Cookies Giant, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility considerations, though these could be improved. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected. The site structure supports SEO best practices with meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential reliance on third-party scripts without explicit vulnerability management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ocspektrum.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ocspektrum.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.