Skip to main content

Security report for ocrrunning.eu

OCRRUNNING.CZ · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OCRRUNNING.CZ operates an e-commerce platform specializing in running, outdoor, and cycling sports products. The website offers a broad catalog of footwear, clothing, and accessories targeting sports enthusiasts, with a focus on providing competitive pricing and customer service. The business appears to be a small retail entity based in the Czech Republic, catering to a general audience interested in sports apparel and equipment. Technically, the website is built on the Binargon e-shop CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies including Google Analytics 4, Google Ads, and reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and product categorization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and basic security best practices observed, though additional security headers and published security policies would enhance protection. Privacy compliance is limited, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which poses a compliance risk under GDPR. WHOIS data is privacy protected by EURid, which is typical for EU domains and justified for this business type. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved privacy and security disclosures to increase trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ocrrunning.eu

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche retailer in the sports apparel and equipment market, focusing on running and outdoor activities. Its competitive advantage lies in offering realistic pricing without artificial discounts and providing advisory services to customers. The business model is direct online retail, targeting individual consumers across multiple European currencies. The presence of multiple product brands and categories indicates a broad supplier network. The website's multilingual support (English and Czech) suggests an intent to serve both local and international customers. The lack of detailed company registration or VAT information on the site limits transparency but is common in small e-commerce operations. The company uses Google Ads and Analytics for marketing and performance tracking, indicating an active digital marketing strategy. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated abuse. However, it lacks several recommended HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could expose it to clickjacking or MIME sniffing attacks. No security.txt or incident response contact information is published, which limits the ability for external parties to report vulnerabilities responsibly. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are absent, posing GDPR compliance risks. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better header configurations and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to comply with GDPR requirements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file, to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance cookie consent mechanisms to actively manage user consent for tracking and storage.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are included.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OCRRUNNING.CZ
Description
Online shop specializing in running, outdoor, and cycling sports equipment and apparel. Offers products at realistic prices with customer service focus and optimal price-quality-performance ratio.
Key services
Online retail of running shoes and apparel, Customer advisory services, Sales of cycling accessories and equipment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, Google Ads, reCAPTCHA v3, Binargon e-shop platform, Glide.js carousel
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics 4
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a specialized e-commerce platform for running, outdoor, and cycling sports products.
  2. Content is well structured with clear product categories and detailed product listings.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in the header with phone and email.
  4. No privacy or cookie policy pages were found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  5. No security.txt or incident response information is published.
  6. Site uses modern tracking and advertising technologies but denies all storage by default until consent.
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected by EURid with no public registrant details.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is fully accessible.
  9. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Binargon e-shop CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as Glide.js for carousels and Google services for analytics and advertising. The HTML structure is well-formed with appropriate meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for user experience. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. The site uses multiple external domains for analytics, ads, and content delivery. There is room for improvement in accessibility features and advanced SEO optimizations. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a functional and user-friendly e-commerce experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ocrrunning.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ocrrunning.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.