Skip to main content

Security report for ocrrunning.cz

OCRRUNNING.CZ · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

OCRRUNNING.CZ is a Czech Republic-based small e-commerce retailer specializing in running and outdoor sports footwear, clothing, and accessories. The website offers a broad catalog of products from well-known brands, targeting general consumers interested in running and outdoor activities. The business emphasizes real pricing without discount presentations and aims to provide optimal price-quality-performance balance along with customer advisory services. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, Google Ads, and reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection. The site is built on the Binargon EshopMaxi CMS platform and is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content relevance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and bot protection in place, but lacks some security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness. Overall, the site is professional and functional but could improve privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ocrrunning.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche retail market focused on running and outdoor sports equipment in the Czech Republic. It leverages direct online sales with a focus on customer service and competitive pricing. The presence of multiple product categories and brands indicates a diverse product offering. The business model is straightforward e-commerce retail without visible subscription or membership models. The website's alternate domain for English language suggests some international outreach. The lack of WHOIS data and privacy policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. No certifications or formal security policies are evident, indicating potential areas for business maturity improvement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a security gap. No visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, which may hinder effective security incident handling. Privacy and cookie policies are missing or not easily discoverable, raising GDPR compliance concerns. The site denies all Google tag storages by default, showing some privacy awareness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in headers, policies, and transparency to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance security transparency and readiness.
  4. Ensure WHOIS data is complete and accurate to improve domain trustworthiness and legitimacy.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
OCRRUNNING.CZ
Description
Online obchod (ne)jen do terénu, prodej a poradenství v oblasti běžeckých sportů. Prodává za reálné ceny bez prezentace slev. Snaží se nabídnout nejlepší cenu, adekvátní zákaznický servis a optimální poměr cena-kvalita-výkon.
Key services
Online retail of running and outdoor footwear, Clothing and accessories sales, Customer advisory services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4 (GA4), Google Ads, Glide.js carousel, Monteserrat font, reCAPTCHA v3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented
  • Consent management for Google tags with all storages denied by default

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics 4
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an e-commerce platform specializing in running and outdoor sports products.
  2. Content is in Czech language with some English alternate links.
  3. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and may indicate privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found on the homepage HTML.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with Czech phone number and company email.
  6. Uses modern tracking and advertising technologies with consent denied by default.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; potential area for improvement.
  8. Site uses HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Google Tag Manager, GA4, Google Ads, and reCAPTCHA v3 integrated. The CMS platform is Binargon EshopMaxi, which supports responsive design and carousel features via Glide.js. The site loads multiple external resources from trusted domains and uses Montserrat font for styling. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the absence of security headers and incomplete privacy mechanisms indicate technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data provided.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ocrrunning.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ocrrunning.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.