Skip to main content

Security report for ocorian.com

Ocorian · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ocorian is a globally recognized leader in fund administration, compliance, corporate, and fiduciary services, serving over 8,000 clients worldwide with a workforce exceeding 1,800 employees across more than 20 countries. The company offers a broad range of specialized services including fund administration, capital markets support, corporate services, and regulatory compliance solutions, targeting asset managers, financial institutions, corporates, high net-worth individuals, and family offices. Their business model emphasizes trusted partnerships, global scale with local expertise, and technology-enabled service delivery. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10 and integrates advanced marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site demonstrates good performance, excellent mobile optimization, and strong SEO and accessibility features. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, employs cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR, and uses reputable third-party services, although explicit security headers could be further verified. The security posture is robust with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The company maintains compliance with privacy regulations, evidenced by comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and active consent management. Overall, the website reflects a mature, professional, and trustworthy digital presence aligned with the company's market position. Strategically, Ocorian should continue to enhance security header implementations, publish explicit security and incident response policies, and maintain vigilance over third-party integrations to sustain its strong security and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ocorian.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
73
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ocorian occupies a strong market position as a global leader in financial services administration, with a diversified portfolio of services catering to multiple sectors within finance. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive expertise, global reach combined with local knowledge, and a large client base that underscores trust and reliability. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on high-value administration and compliance solutions, supported by technology platforms like HubSpot for marketing and client engagement. Growth indicators include a large workforce, multiple global offices, and a comprehensive service offering. The partnership ecosystem includes major platforms such as HubSpot, Google, and LinkedIn, enhancing their marketing and analytics capabilities. The company’s operations reflect a strategic focus on compliance, client trust, and digital maturity.

Security posture

Ocorian demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, GDPR-compliant cookie consent, and use of reputable third-party security and analytics tools. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. However, explicit documentation of security policies and incident response procedures is absent, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The integration of multiple tracking and marketing scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring to mitigate potential risks. Overall, the security culture appears proactive, balancing user privacy with business analytics needs, but could benefit from formalized security policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publicly disclose a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  2. Verify and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense-in-depth.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and integrations for vulnerabilities and privacy compliance.
  4. Enhance form security by implementing CAPTCHA or other anti-bot measures to prevent automated abuse.
  5. Maintain and update cookie consent mechanisms to align with evolving privacy regulations and user expectations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ocorian
Description
Ocorian is a global leader in fund administration, compliance, corporate and fiduciary services. They empower corporate, capital markets, fund and private clients to focus on their investment objectives by delivering leading administration, fiduciary, compliance and legal services.
Key services
Fund administration, Capital markets services, Corporate services, Compliance solutions, Trust services, Employee incentive services, SPV administration, Regulatory and legal services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cookiebot, Cloudflare (implied by __cf_bm cookie), StackAdapt, Mimecast
Frameworks
Drupal
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, StackAdapt
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, HubSpot, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
HubSpot forms and marketing, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern technologies and CMS (Drupal 10).
  2. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent regulations.
  3. Multiple marketing and analytics tools integrated.
  4. Comprehensive service offerings in finance sector.
  5. No visible security or content blocking issues.
  6. Clear navigation and professional design.
  7. No exposed sensitive information detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS, indicating a solid technical foundation. Integration with HubSpot for marketing and forms, Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking, Hotjar for user behavior analysis, and LinkedIn Insight Tag for professional networking analytics demonstrates a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to optimize performance. Mobile optimization and accessibility are well addressed, contributing to a positive user experience. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare services, enhancing security and performance. Opportunities exist to further optimize security headers and formalize security documentation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ocorian.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ocorian.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.