Skip to main content

Security report for oceanice-congres.com

Centre des Congrès Océanice · Hospitality · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.oceanice-congres.com represents the Centre des Congrès Océanice, a modern congress and event center located in Nice, France. It offers modular event spaces, accessibility features, and an eco-responsible approach to hosting events. The site targets event organizers, businesses, associations, and public entities seeking professional venues in the region. The business model focuses on venue rental and associated event services, positioning itself as a new and environmentally conscious player in the hospitality sector of Nice. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.6.2 with a variety of plugins including Yoast SEO for optimization, Iris Map for mapping features, and Sentry for error tracking. It uses modern web technologies such as jQuery and MapLibre GL JS. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, with good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and technical enhancements. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and employs Sentry for monitoring. However, it lacks explicit security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, although the website content itself appears professional and legitimate. Overall, the website presents a solid business presence with good technical implementation and security posture but requires improvements in privacy compliance and domain registration transparency to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oceanice-congres.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Centre des Congrès Océanice operates in the hospitality sector, specifically focusing on event and congress venue services in Nice, France. The company leverages modern facilities with an eco-responsible commitment to attract a diverse clientele including corporate, association, and public sector event organizers. The business model is primarily based on venue rental and complementary event services such as accommodation partnerships and dedicated event teams. The website's professional design and SEO optimization indicate a strategic approach to market positioning. However, the lack of visible company registration details and contact information on the site limits full business transparency. The domain's WHOIS data absence suggests either a recent registration or privacy protection, which should be clarified for enhanced credibility. The company appears to be a medium-sized entity with a focus on regional market penetration and sustainable event hosting.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and SSL configured properly, ensuring encrypted communications. The use of Sentry for error and performance monitoring indicates proactive operational security management. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No sensitive data leakage or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which is a compliance risk under GDPR and other privacy regulations. The lack of explicit incident response contacts or security policies further limits the site's security maturity. Overall, the site is secure but would benefit from implementing additional security best practices and formalizing privacy and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general inquiries and security incidents.
  4. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is complete and transparent to improve trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Centre des Congrès Océanice
Description
Découvrez OcéaNice, le nouveau Centre des Congrès à Nice : espaces modulables, accessibilité optimale et engagement éco-responsable pour vos événements.
Key services
Modular event spaces, Accessibility services, Dedicated event team, Accommodation partnerships, Event services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Iris Map plugin, Sentry for error tracking, MapLibre GL JS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Sentry
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is in French with English alternate language
  3. Professional event center website with modular spaces and eco-responsible focus
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in provided HTML
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content
  6. Uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with a well-maintained tech stack including Yoast SEO for search optimization, jQuery for scripting, and MapLibre GL JS for interactive maps. The integration of Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics supports marketing and analytics needs. Sentry integration provides error tracking and performance monitoring. The site uses custom fonts and styles with good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and resource optimization. The absence of explicit hosting provider information limits full infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for enhancements in security headers and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oceanice-congres.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oceanice-congres.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.