Skip to main content

Security report for objectivewealthfp.com

Objective Wealth · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Objective Wealth is a small financial advisory firm specializing in tax-conscious comprehensive financial planning and investment management. The website presents a professional image with clear descriptions of services including financial and retirement planning, investment management, tax planning and preparation, and small business retirement plans. The firm targets individuals and small businesses seeking personalized financial guidance. The website is built on a modern technical stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, and uses Zephyr CMS. Tracking technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are implemented for analytics and marketing purposes. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage implied, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and reduces overall trust. No forms or direct contact information were found in the provided content, limiting user engagement options. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance, and verified domain registration information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching objectivewealthfp.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance sector, focusing on personalized financial planning and investment management services. Its business model is fee-based advisory, targeting clients who value tax-conscious strategies and comprehensive planning. The website's market positioning is niche, emphasizing partnership and trust with clients navigating financial decisions. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn supports brand visibility and client engagement. The lack of detailed business registration or VAT information on the site limits transparency. The firm appears to be independent with no parent or subsidiary companies mentioned. Growth potential is supported by virtual and tech-forward service delivery, accommodating clients across multiple states. Strategic partnerships or payment processors were not identified from the data.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-XSS-Protection were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are essential for GDPR and other privacy regulations compliance. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the firm's readiness to handle security incidents. Tracking scripts from Google and Facebook are present, indicating moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in headers, policies, and transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  3. Verify and publish domain WHOIS registration information to enhance legitimacy and trust.
  4. Include clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve user engagement and credibility.
  5. Establish an incident response policy and provide security contact channels to demonstrate security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Objective Wealth
Description
Objective Wealth walks along side you as a partner to help you navigate life's financial twists and turns. We help you manage both current financial concerns as well as plan for what comes next.
Key services
Financial & Retirement Planning, Investment Management, Tax Planning & Preparation, Small Business Retirement Plans
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Magnific Popup
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers is not explicitly present in the HTML content provided.
  5. Social media links are present and point to legitimate platforms.
  6. Website uses modern frontend technologies and tracking scripts.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown but URL is HTTPS.
  8. Content is focused on financial planning and investment management services.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Zephyr CMS with frontend technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and FontAwesome. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed metrics available. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic, with no advanced ARIA or accessibility features detected. No forms were found in the provided HTML snippet, indicating limited data collection points. Hosting provider details are not available from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with objectivewealthfp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review objectivewealthfp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.