Skip to main content

Security report for oberstdorf.de

Tourismus Oberstdorf · Hospitality · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Tourismus Oberstdorf operates a comprehensive tourism website promoting Oberstdorf, Germany, as a premier destination for alpine activities including hiking, skiing, and family vacations. The site offers accommodation booking, event information, and digital planning tools, positioning itself as a key regional tourism authority. The website is well-branded, content-rich, and targets tourists seeking outdoor and cultural experiences in the Allgäu Alps. Technically, the site uses a modern stack including RequireJS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and a proprietary CMS platform (Tramino). It is hosted with Amazon S3 for static assets and optimized for mobile devices with good SEO and accessibility practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though some advanced security headers and explicit security policies are absent. The site employs multiple advertising and tracking technologies with user consent, reflecting a mature digital marketing approach. WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with the business profile. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oberstdorf.de

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention oberstdorf.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for oberstdorf.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as a digital gateway for Oberstdorf tourism, leveraging partnerships with local attractions and service providers. Its business model focuses on destination marketing and facilitating bookings and visitor engagement. The presence of multiple social media channels and digital tools indicates a strategy to engage diverse customer segments including families, outdoor enthusiasts, and winter sports fans. The site’s content and navigation support a high-quality user experience, reinforcing Oberstdorf's market position as a leading alpine destination. Partnerships with regional entities and integration of third-party marketing platforms suggest a well-established ecosystem. No direct revenue models like e-commerce beyond booking facilitation are evident, emphasizing its role as a promotional and informational platform.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent management, and asynchronous loading of scripts to reduce attack surface. It uses Google Tag Manager and analytics with consent, and includes tracking pixels from reputable ad networks. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No incident response or security policy pages are found, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The use of an older jQuery version may pose some risk if not regularly patched. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could benefit from enhanced security controls and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options headers to strengthen security.
  2. Update jQuery to a current supported version to mitigate legacy vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies for compliance and security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tourismus Oberstdorf
Description
Oberstdorf is the southernmost municipality in Germany, a health and spa resort in the Allgäu Alps offering hiking, skiing, and family activities. The site promotes tourism, accommodations, events, and local culture.
Key services
Accommodation booking, Event and activity information, Tourist information and guides, Digital tools like Urlaubsplaner and Alpininfo
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, RequireJS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, DoubleClick, Fancybox, Slick Slider, LazySizes, Tramino CMS and Collectible
Frameworks
RequireJS
Platforms
Tramino CMS platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async loading for scripts
  • Error reporting via fetch to /api/codes/error/

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdWords, Bing Ads, MiQ, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, MiQ Pixel, DoubleClick Floodlight
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, MiQ
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented.
  3. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools with consent management.
  4. Clear contact information and social media presence.
  5. Modern responsive design with good SEO and accessibility.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  7. WHOIS data is minimal but domain appears legitimate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tramino CMS platform, utilizing RequireJS for modular JavaScript loading and jQuery 1.12.4 for DOM manipulation. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking, alongside advertising pixels from MiQ, DoubleClick, Bing Ads, and Facebook. Static assets are served from Amazon S3 and CDN domains, ensuring scalability. The site employs lazy loading for images and videos, enhancing performance and mobile experience. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD breadcrumbs. Accessibility features and responsive design are well implemented. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in script loading and asset compression. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and robust, supporting a professional tourism website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oberstdorf.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oberstdorf.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.