Skip to main content

Security report for oberauer.com

Medienfachverlag Johann Oberauer GmbH · Media · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Medienfachverlag Johann Oberauer GmbH is a leading media publishing company in the DACH region specializing in journalism, PR, communication, and printing industry publications and events. The company operates multiple industry magazines, organizes prestigious events and awards, and manages digital portals and job platforms targeting media professionals. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, WP Rocket, and Google Tag Manager, optimized for performance and SEO but currently lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical security gap. The security posture shows good email authentication practices with SPF and DMARC but misses HTTPS enforcement and advanced DNS security features. Overall, the company demonstrates strong market positioning and digital maturity but should urgently address SSL/TLS issues to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oberauer.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
90
GDPR outside view
43
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as a specialized media publisher and event organizer in the German-speaking countries. Its business model combines traditional publishing with digital platforms and event management, serving a professional audience of journalists, communicators, and media managers. The presence of multiple branded media outlets and industry events indicates diversified revenue streams and a robust partnership ecosystem. The website's integration with marketing and analytics tools like Mailchimp and Google Analytics supports data-driven customer engagement. Growth indicators include recent news updates and active event promotion. Strategic partnerships with organizations like DPRG and media camps enhance its industry influence.

Security posture

Current security maturity is moderate with foundational email security controls (SPF, DMARC) in place, but significant gaps exist in transport layer security due to an invalid or missing SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS enforcement. The absence of DNSSEC and CAA records further exposes the domain to DNS spoofing and unauthorized certificate issuance risks. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented in compliance with GDPR, reflecting good privacy practices. However, no explicit security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are publicly available, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The website would benefit from enhanced security headers and TLS configuration to mitigate risks and improve user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Install and properly configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Implement DNSSEC and CAA DNS records to strengthen domain and certificate security.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers and review third-party scripts for privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Medienfachverlag Johann Oberauer GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS using the Freesia Empire theme, leveraging jQuery and various plugins including WP Rocket for caching and lazy loading, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Mailchimp for newsletter management. DNS records show a valid SPF and DMARC setup for email authentication but lack DNSSEC and CAA. SSL/TLS is not properly configured, with no supported TLS versions detected and no HSTS enabled, posing a risk to secure communications. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 3.7 seconds and use of lazy loading for images and scripts. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with structured data and meta tags. Hosting appears to be managed via corpex-dns and Trend Micro for mail services. Technical debt includes the missing SSL certificate and incomplete security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oberauer.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oberauer.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.