Skip to main content

Security report for obchodulidusky.cz

U Lidušky · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

U Lidušky is a small, family-run retail business operating multiple farm food stores and a bistro in Plzeň, Czech Republic, since 2014. They focus on healthy, local, and farm-sourced products including bakery items, meats, and gluten-free foods. Their market position is that of a trusted local provider emphasizing quality and freshness. Technically, the website is built on the Webnode CMS platform, uses Amazon Cloudfront CDN, and integrates standard analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and a published privacy policy, which are important for GDPR compliance. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness, though the website content and contact details suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site scores well on content and technical implementation but should improve privacy and security disclosures to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching obchodulidusky.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector focusing on healthy and local farm products, targeting families and health-conscious consumers in Plzeň. Their business model is based on physical stores and a bistro with in-house bakery production. They maintain a consistent brand presence and engage customers via social media channels. The absence of WHOIS data and privacy policy are notable gaps. The company appears to have stable local market positioning with potential for growth by enhancing digital trust and compliance. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. Their partnership ecosystem is limited to local suppliers and farm producers.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, indicating basic security awareness. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces moderate tracking but no evident vulnerabilities. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better headers, privacy disclosures, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Provide incident response contact information, such as a dedicated security or abuse email.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts to minimize security risks and improve privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
U Lidušky
Description
Rodinné farmářské obchody s vlastní pekárnou, lahůdkárnou a kuchyní, fungující od roku 2014. Nabízí zdravé potraviny, podporují rodinné farmáře a lokální výrobce. Prodejny se nacházejí v Plzni na několika místech, včetně farmářského bistra a cukrárny.
Key services
Prodej zdravých potravin, Farmářské maso, Bezlepkové potraviny, Farmářské bistro a cukrárna, Pronájem prostor
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cloudfront CDN, Webnode CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with advanced settings
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in Czech language targeting local customers in Plzeň
  3. No privacy policy page found despite GDPR relevance
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented with advanced options
  5. WHOIS data is missing, limiting domain trust verification
  6. Website uses standard tracking and marketing scripts
  7. No security.txt or incident response info found
  8. Contact info includes phone and email in footer
  9. No terms of service or security policy pages detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webnode CMS platform and uses Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, which supports good performance and scalability. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive CSS and modern HTML5 features. However, no advanced frameworks or platforms are detected. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The absence of security headers and WHOIS data are technical risks that should be addressed to improve overall site security and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with obchodulidusky.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review obchodulidusky.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.