Skip to main content

Security report for oaktreeacquisitioncorp.com

Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oaktree Acquisition Corp. is a finance-focused platform operating multiple SPAC vehicles to facilitate investment and acquisition transactions. The company is positioned as an established player in the SPAC market, targeting investors and partners interested in SPAC transactions. The website presents clear business information, including multiple SPAC vehicles and recent news updates, reflecting a professional and consistent brand image. Technically, the site uses modern front-end frameworks such as Bootstrap 5 and integrates with Cloudflare for hosting and CDN services. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS protocols significantly weaken the security posture. Privacy compliance is partially addressed through Evidon cookie consent mechanisms and a privacy policy hosted on the parent domain, but GDPR compliance is not clearly demonstrated. Overall, the website is functional and informative but requires critical security improvements to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oaktreeacquisitioncorp.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the finance sector with a focus on SPAC vehicles, leveraging its parent company Oaktree Capital Management, L.P. The business model centers on sourcing and managing SPAC transactions, targeting institutional investors and partners. The website content and external press releases indicate active market engagement and capital raising activities. The partnership ecosystem includes the parent company and external news distribution via BusinessWire. The company maintains a professional online presence but lacks detailed contact information such as phone numbers or physical addresses, which may limit direct customer engagement. Growth indicators include multiple SPAC vehicles and recent IPO announcements. Strategic observations suggest a need for enhanced digital security and clearer compliance communication to support investor confidence.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, exposing users to potential risks. While HTTP headers include HSTS, the SSL configuration is inconsistent and incomplete. No vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, but the lack of OCSP stapling and session resumption reduces security effectiveness. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. Data protection practices are minimal, with only basic cookie consent management via Evidon. Compliance gaps exist regarding GDPR and other data protection regulations. The security culture appears underdeveloped, with recommendations focusing on certificate management, protocol upgrades, and policy publication to improve overall posture.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and protect user data.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated versions.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  4. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by clearly stating GDPR adherence and data retention policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap 5, jQuery, FontAwesome, and Google Fonts, with Sitefinity CMS inferred from resource paths. Hosting is via Cloudflare CDN, providing performance and security benefits. However, performance metrics are missing or zero, indicating potential measurement gaps or slow loading. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and adaptive navigation menus. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA or semantic improvements possible. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data but no JSON-LD structured data found. Technical debt includes the invalid SSL certificate and lack of modern TLS support, which pose operational risks. Modernization opportunities include improving SSL configuration, enhancing accessibility, and adding structured data for SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oaktreeacquisitioncorp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oaktreeacquisitioncorp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.