Skip to main content

Security report for oakley.com

Oakley, Inc. · Retail · N/A

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Oakley, Inc. operates a comprehensive e-commerce platform offering premium sunglasses, goggles, apparel, and accessories. As a subsidiary of Luxottica Group S.p.A., Oakley holds a strong market position in the retail and sports eyewear industry, targeting consumers seeking high-quality and customizable products. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with advanced personalization, multimedia content, and multi-region support. Security measures are robust with strong SSL configurations and security headers, although some improvements in TLS protocol support and public security policies are recommended. Overall, Oakley maintains a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness in its online presence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of oakley.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching oakley.com

This scan found 11 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
85
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Oakley leverages its parent company's resources to maintain a competitive edge in the premium eyewear market. The business model focuses on direct-to-consumer sales via a well-structured e-commerce platform, supported by a loyalty program and extensive product customization options. The company targets active lifestyle and sports enthusiasts, offering specialized products for various sports categories. Partnerships with Luxottica and related brands enhance its market reach. The website's multi-language and multi-country support indicate a global market strategy. Marketing and personalization tools like Monetate and Tealium are employed to optimize customer engagement and conversion.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with comprehensive HTTP security headers, HSTS with preload, and a valid DigiCert SSL certificate. Cookies are set with Secure and HttpOnly flags, and SameSite policies are enforced. No critical SSL/TLS vulnerabilities were detected. However, the absence of TLS 1.2 or higher protocol support is a notable gap. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is evident through cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policy content. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced by adopting modern TLS protocols and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols to ensure secure and modern encryption standards.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Implement DNSSEC and CAA DNS records to strengthen domain security and certificate issuance control.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Continue enhancing privacy compliance and user consent mechanisms in line with evolving regulations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on SAP Hybris (now SAP Commerce) with CoreMedia CMS, leveraging RequireJS and jQuery for modular JavaScript loading. It uses Akamai as the CDN and hosting provider, ensuring fast content delivery. Multimedia content is managed with lazy loading and video components, including YouTube embeds and custom video players. Personalization and marketing are handled via Monetate and Tealium. The site is optimized for mobile with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is fast, and SEO practices are good, with comprehensive metadata and Open Graph tags. Some technical debt is indicated by disabled modern TLS protocols, which should be addressed to maintain security and compatibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100Low22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with oakley.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review oakley.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.