Skip to main content

Security report for nutrlusa.com

NÜTRL® · Retail · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NÜTRL is a small retail brand specializing in vodka seltzers made with real vodka and juice, targeting adult consumers of legal drinking age. The website reflects a modern digital presence built on Svelte and Builder.io, with integrated analytics and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy. The site enforces age verification and links to active social media channels, supporting brand engagement. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacks explicit security headers and formal privacy policies. Overall, the site is functional and professionally designed but requires improvements in compliance and trust signals.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain:

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nutrlusa.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NÜTRL operates in the alcoholic beverage retail sector with a focus on vodka seltzers, a growing market niche. The business model likely includes direct sales and retail distribution, supported by product information and store locator features. The brand emphasizes quality ingredients and responsible drinking, appealing to adult consumers. Social media integration and marketing tools indicate active customer engagement. The lack of WHOIS data and formal policies suggests potential risks in business transparency and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security measures such as HTTPS and age verification but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are present, limiting transparency. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, indicating some privacy compliance effort. The missing WHOIS data is a significant concern, potentially indicating domain registration issues. Overall, security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced with better policy disclosures and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Register domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is publicly available or justified with privacy protection.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to enhance security transparency.
  5. Improve accessibility features and SEO metadata for better user experience and search ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NÜTRL®
Description
NÜTRL produces vodka seltzers made with real vodka and real juice, targeting legal drinking age consumers. The brand emphasizes taste and responsible drinking.
Key services
Alcoholic beverage production, Product information and sales, Retail locator service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Svelte, Builder.io, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
SvelteKit
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by script sources)
  • Age verification gate implemented
  • Cookie consent mechanism present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Builder.io pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website includes an age verification gate for legal drinking age compliance.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or linked pages.
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented using OneTrust.
  4. Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter is linked.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  6. Website uses modern frontend technologies (Svelte, Builder.io).
  7. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  9. Contact form is linked but form details not fully extracted from truncated HTML.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Svelte and Builder.io CMS, supported by Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and includes a cookie consent mechanism. Performance is moderate with some room for improvement in SEO and accessibility. Hosting provider details are not evident. The site lacks explicit security headers and formal compliance documentation, representing technical debt and compliance risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nutrlusa.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nutrlusa.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.