Skip to main content

Security report for nutriciaoncology.pl

NUTRICIA Polska Sp. z o.o. · Healthcare · Poland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Posilkiwchorobie.pl is a professionally maintained healthcare website operated by NUTRICIA Polska Sp. z o.o., focusing on medical nutrition for patients with oncological and neurological conditions. The site offers educational content, product information, recipes, and expert advice, positioning itself as a trusted resource in the Polish healthcare nutrition market. The business model combines informational services with product promotion and e-commerce links, targeting patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. The website demonstrates consistent branding and a clear focus on its niche audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress 6.8.2, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and New Relic for performance and monitoring. It is hosted by cyber_Folks S.A., a reputable registrar and hosting provider. The site shows good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, with fast loading times and structured metadata enhancing search visibility. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and uses monitoring tools but lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms, reflecting adherence to GDPR requirements. Overall, posilkiwchorobie.pl presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, implementing comprehensive security headers, publishing a security policy, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process to further enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nutriciaoncology.pl

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
90
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves a specialized healthcare niche, providing medical nutrition information and products primarily for oncology and neurology patients in Poland. It benefits from association with the established Nutricia brand, enhancing market credibility. The business model integrates content marketing with direct product sales via linked e-commerce platforms. The presence of educational resources, FAQs, and expert advice supports customer engagement and retention. Partnerships with related Nutricia sites and academies indicate a robust ecosystem. Growth potential lies in expanding digital outreach and enhancing direct-to-consumer sales channels.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate to good, with HTTPS enforced and use of monitoring tools like New Relic. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents an area for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were identified in the analyzed content. Privacy compliance is strong, with GDPR-aligned policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is secure but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NUTRICIA Polska Sp. z o.o.
Description
Posiłki w Chorobie to serwis poświęcony żywieniu w chorobie onkologicznej lub neurologicznej: sprawdzone porady, przepisy i preparaty.
Key services
Medical nutrition information, Product promotion and sales, Educational content and recipes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, New Relic monitoring, jQuery
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring tools (New Relic)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Tag Manager
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (implied via GTM), New Relic
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and maintained
  2. Content is focused on medical nutrition for oncology and neurology patients
  3. Clear navigation with dedicated sections for products, knowledge, recipes, and FAQs
  4. Presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  5. Use of modern web technologies and performance monitoring
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  7. Contact phone number prominently displayed
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and YouTube
  9. No visible security policy or incident response information
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform, utilizing Google Tag Manager for analytics and New Relic for performance monitoring. It uses Google Fonts and jQuery libraries. Hosting is provided by cyber_Folks S.A., a known registrar and hosting provider. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness, accessibility features, and SEO optimization with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with caching and minified CSS/JS assets. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and DNSSEC are missing, representing modernization opportunities. Overall, the infrastructure supports stable and professional operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 56/100Medium25 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nutriciaoncology.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nutriciaoncology.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.