Skip to main content

Security report for nutricia.dk

Nutricia A/S · Healthcare · Denmark

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nutricia A/S is a well-established healthcare company specializing in medical nutrition products for adults and children, supporting nutritional management before, during, and after disease treatment. The company operates under the global parent Danone and maintains a strong market position in Denmark and beyond. Their website reflects a professional digital presence with clear branding, relevant content, and a focus on patient and healthcare professional audiences. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for cookie consent, and it employs New Relic for performance monitoring. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers are not detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and GDPR adherence. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, slightly impacting overall credibility. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nutricia.dk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
95
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nutricia A/S leverages its affiliation with Danone to maintain a strong foothold in the healthcare nutrition sector. Their business model combines direct consumer engagement with healthcare professional support, offering specialized nutritional products and educational resources. The company targets patients with specific medical needs and healthcare providers, emphasizing sustainability and innovation. The website's content and navigation support these goals effectively, with dedicated sections for products, services, and informational resources. Partnerships with regulatory and professional sites enhance credibility. Growth indicators include active social media presence and ongoing content updates. The company’s strategic focus on sustainability aligns with broader industry trends, positioning it well for future expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. Use of New Relic indicates active monitoring of site performance and potential errors. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in defense-in-depth strategies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Incident response and security policy information are not explicitly provided, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the site maintains a good security baseline appropriate for its industry and audience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
  4. Enhance visibility of contact information for privacy and security inquiries to facilitate user trust and compliance.
  5. Consider obtaining and publishing relevant certifications to strengthen trust signals.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nutricia A/S
Description
Nutricia A/S offers specialized nutritional products and solutions supporting nutritional management before, during, and after disease treatment. They focus on nutrition for adults and children, including medical nutrition drinks and products for specific medical conditions.
Key services
Medical nutrition products, Nutritional support for adults and children, Educational resources and symptom checkers, Sustainability initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, New Relic monitoring
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to medical nutrition.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and monitoring tools.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage; contact pages exist but not parsed here.
  6. Social media links are consistent with company branding.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end leveraging jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. OneTrust is used for cookie consent management, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate with lazy loading and script optimization techniques in place. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO. Monitoring via New Relic provides insights into site health and user experience. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, and WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits full infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a stable and professional online presence with opportunities for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nutricia.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nutricia.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.