Skip to main content

Security report for notfans.com

NotFans · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NotFans is a small-scale adult content website specializing in providing free access to leaked videos primarily from OnlyFans and similar platforms. The site targets adult consumers interested in free adult content and operates by aggregating and hosting leaked videos. The business model is based on free content access without clear monetization details. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, jQuery, and Cloudflare DNS services. The site is mobile responsive and has basic SEO and accessibility features but lacks advanced technical frameworks or CMS detection. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no security headers or privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent or privacy policy. The absence of verified contact information and trust indicators reduces business credibility. WHOIS data shows the domain is registered with a reputable registrar and is consistent with the website's age and content type. Overall, the site presents moderate technical implementation but poor privacy and security compliance, resulting in a moderate risk profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching notfans.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NotFans occupies a niche in the adult content leak market, focusing on free leaked OnlyFans and related platform videos. Its competitive advantage lies in free access and a simple user interface. The business model appears to rely on content aggregation and hosting without clear revenue streams or partnerships. The target audience is adult users seeking free adult content. There is no evidence of formal partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators are limited due to lack of transparency. The site lacks professional trust signals such as certifications or verified business contacts, which may impact user trust and legal standing.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low to moderate. HTTPS is implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options exposes the site to common web vulnerabilities. No privacy policy or cookie consent mechanisms are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. Forms exist but lack visible security measures. The site does not appear to use vulnerable libraries but lacks advanced security best practices. Overall, the security posture poses moderate risk to users and the business.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance security.
  3. Provide verified contact information including security and abuse contacts for incident response.
  4. Introduce cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NotFans
Description
NotFans is a website offering free leaked videos and content primarily from OnlyFans, Manyvids, Patreon, Twitch, and other platforms. It focuses on adult content, specifically leaked videos of influencers, cosplayers, gamer girls, and adult content creators.
Key services
Free access to leaked OnlyFans videos, Search and categorization of adult leaked content, Mobile responsive video streaming
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, jQuery, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts and distributes leaked adult content without clear privacy or cookie policies.
  2. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; only contact form available.
  3. No security headers detected, which is a security concern.
  4. Site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security configurations.
  5. No privacy or cookie consent mechanisms, indicating poor privacy compliance.
  6. Content is adult-oriented and likely violates content ownership rights.
  7. Site design and navigation are functional but basic.
  8. No social media or external verified business links found.
  9. WHOIS data is consistent but minimal registrant info reduces credibility.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a basic technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, and jQuery. It is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS but no CDN or advanced hosting details are evident. The site is mobile responsive and has basic SEO meta tags but lacks structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization detected. Accessibility features are minimal. The site does not use a known CMS or modern frameworks. Technical debt is moderate due to lack of advanced security and privacy features. Modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS, improving SEO with structured data, and enhancing accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with notfans.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review notfans.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.