Skip to main content

Security report for nordeafunds.com

Nordea Funds Oy · Finance · Finland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nordea Funds Oy operates as a Nordic investment fund company focused on creating added value for investors through reliable, transparent, and responsible investment practices. The company leverages the extensive investment expertise of the Nordea Group, positioning itself strongly in the Nordic financial market. The website is professionally designed using Drupal 10, featuring comprehensive content about funds, responsible investing, and market insights, primarily targeting Finnish-speaking investors and savers. Technically, the site employs modern analytics and tag management tools such as Adobe Analytics and Tealium, with good mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers are not evident. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, but the website's branding and content align with a reputable financial institution. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence for Nordea Funds Oy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nordeafunds.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nordea Funds Oy benefits from its affiliation with Nordea Bank Oyj, the largest financial group in the Nordic region, providing it with significant market credibility and resources. Its business model centers on fund management and responsible investment services, targeting both individual savers and investors. The company emphasizes active portfolio management based on market insights and corporate responsibility analysis, which is a competitive advantage in the sustainable finance sector. The website content and awards such as the Responsible Investment Brand Index highlight its commitment to ESG principles. The digital presence supports customer engagement through newsletters, articles, and a contact form, though direct contact details are limited. The company appears to maintain a strong partnership ecosystem within the Nordea group, enhancing its market position and growth potential.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and a clear cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. Use of reputable analytics and tag management platforms indicates controlled data collection practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in defense-in-depth strategies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which is common but could be enhanced for transparency. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by publishing security policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Add HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clearer contact information including verified company emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and minimize tracking footprint.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nordea Funds Oy
Description
Nordea Funds on innovatiivinen rahastoyhtiö, jonka tavoitteena on luoda lisäarvoa sijoittajille. Rahastotoiminnan peruselementtejä ovat luotettavuus, avoimuus ja läpinäkyvyys sekä aktiivinen omistajapolitiikka ja vastuullinen sijoittaminen.
Key services
rahastojen hallinnointi, vastuullinen sijoittaminen, sijoitusneuvonta
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, GSAP, Tealium, Adobe Analytics
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • cookie consent mechanism
  • no exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Tealium, Adobe Analytics
Marketing tools
Tealium Tag Manager
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Finnish language.
  2. Strong focus on responsible investment and Nordic market.
  3. Uses modern CMS (Drupal 10) and analytics tools.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are clearly presented.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact form present.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection.
  7. No security headers explicitly detected in HTML source.
  8. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS, ensuring a robust content management framework. It uses GSAP for animations and integrates Adobe Analytics and Tealium for data analytics and tag management, reflecting a mature digital marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized with responsive images and accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA labels. Performance is moderate, with some large images and multiple external scripts that could be optimized further. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and Open Graph data. The lack of visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data are technical risks that should be addressed to improve trust and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nordeafunds.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nordeafunds.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.