Skip to main content

Security report for nordea.se

Nordea Bank Abp, filial i Sverige · Finance · Sweden

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nordea Bank Abp, filial i Sverige, operates a comprehensive banking website serving private individuals and businesses in Sweden. The site offers a wide range of financial services including loans, savings, investments, pensions, insurance, and digital banking solutions. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and extensive content tailored to its target audience. Nordea holds a strong market position as a leading Nordic financial institution with a large enterprise footprint. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies, including asynchronous JavaScript loading, SVG logos, and tag management via Tealium and Adobe Target, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and no detected vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, including consent mechanisms and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website reflects a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical maturity, although WHOIS data for the subdomain www.nordea.se is missing, likely due to querying the subdomain instead of the root domain. This does not detract from the legitimacy of the site given the strong brand and security indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nordea.se

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nordea's website targets private customers and businesses in Sweden, offering a full suite of banking and financial services. The business model is centered on retail and corporate banking with digital service delivery. The company leverages partnerships and subsidiaries for specialized services such as digital signing, accounting, and fleet management. The site integrates multiple login portals for different customer segments, enhancing user experience and service segmentation. Nordea's market presence is reinforced by its extensive service offerings and digital maturity. The company maintains active social media channels to engage customers and enhance brand visibility. The website's content strategy focuses on education, financial planning, and product promotion, supporting customer acquisition and retention. Nordea's compliance with privacy regulations and transparent policies further strengthen its market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a strong security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide, modern security headers including Content Security Policy, and no visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The use of secure cookies and asynchronous script loading reduces attack surface. However, the absence of publicly available incident response or security policy pages and lack of a security.txt file indicate areas for improvement in transparency and vulnerability disclosure. The site employs third-party tag management and analytics tools, which should be regularly audited to prevent supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is high, appropriate for a major financial institution, but could benefit from enhanced public security communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and customer trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tag management tools to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Ensure all external links use HTTPS to maintain secure user experience.
  5. Maintain up-to-date WHOIS records for all domain variants to avoid inconsistencies and improve domain trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nordea Bank Abp, filial i Sverige
VAT number
SE663000019501
Registration number
516411-1683
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nordea Bank Abp, filial i Sverige
Description
Banken med enkla lösningar för både privatpersoner och företag. Vi erbjuder rådgivning för hela din ekonomi. Vi finns runt om i landet, på kontor och online.
Key services
Bank accounts, Loans and credits, Savings and investments, Pension services, Insurance, Digital banking services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, SVG, Web fonts (WOFF2), Tealium (tag management), Adobe Target (A/B testing), Google Tag Manager, Async script loading
Frameworks
dotXX2017 (custom CMS or framework)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies
  • Content Security Policy
  • Use of modern cryptographic protocols

Analytics and tracking

Services
Tealium
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Tealium, Adobe Target
Marketing tools
Tealium, Adobe Target
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is comprehensive and professionally presented
  3. Strong focus on privacy and cookie compliance with clear policies
  4. Multiple digital banking login portals for private and corporate customers
  5. Use of modern web technologies and tag management
  6. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected
  7. WHOIS data missing for subdomain but website is consistent with a major bank
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including JavaScript, SVG graphics, and web fonts, with asynchronous loading to optimize performance. The CMS appears to be SDL Tridion, indicated by TCM component IDs in the source. Tag management is handled by Tealium and Adobe Target, supporting marketing and analytics needs. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and SEO best practices. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in load times. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The technical infrastructure supports a large-scale enterprise banking website with robust security and privacy controls. Opportunities exist to enhance performance and transparency around hosting and security operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nordea.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nordea.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.