Skip to main content

Security report for nonsense.tv

Nonsense TV · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nonsense TV is a specialized media production company offering a range of video and animation services including film production, animated videos, YouTube advertising, and explainer videos. The company targets businesses and organizations seeking professional media content to enhance their marketing efforts. Their portfolio showcases diverse projects, indicating a creative and client-focused approach. Technically, the website is built on the Fabrik CMS platform, uses modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager and jQuery, and is served securely over HTTPS. The site demonstrates good design quality, mobile optimization, and SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Security-wise, the site benefits from HTTPS and privacy-conscious Google Tag Manager configuration but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance elements such as a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, which impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the website presents a professional image but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nonsense.tv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nonsense TV operates in the media sector with a service-based business model focused on video and animation production. Their market positioning is that of a creative agency with a strong portfolio and social media presence, targeting businesses needing high-quality media content. The company appears to be small in size with no publicly disclosed parent or subsidiary relationships. Revenue streams likely derive from client projects and advertising services. The website's clear presentation of services and contact information supports client engagement. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related domains or payment processors were identified. Strategic observations suggest opportunities for growth through enhanced digital marketing and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and Google Tag Manager configured to anonymize IP addresses and use secure cookie flags. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security represents a gap in best practices. No forms or input fields were detected on the homepage, reducing immediate risk from input-based vulnerabilities. The absence of a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, limiting transparency. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities were detected, the site would benefit from implementing security headers, privacy policies, and formal incident response contacts to enhance its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with a user consent mechanism to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  3. Establish and publicly disclose an incident response process and contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are used.
  5. Improve accessibility features to enhance usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nonsense TV
Description
Nonsense TV is a media production company specializing in video production, film production, animated videos, YouTube advertising, explainer videos, and video marketing services.
Key services
Video Production, Film Production, Animated Videos, YouTube Advertising, Explainer Videos, Animation, Video Marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Fabrik CMS, Google Fonts (Work Sans)
Frameworks
Fabrik
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Tag Manager configured with anonymize_ip and secure cookie flags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information includes a company email and phone number clearly labeled.
  5. Website uses HTTPS and Google Tag Manager with privacy-conscious settings.
  6. No security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
  7. Website content is professional and relevant to media production services.
  8. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via email or phone.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook and Vimeo supports brand trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Fabrik CMS platform, leveraging jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. Google Fonts are used for typography, specifically the Work Sans font family. The site loads asynchronously and defers scripts to optimize performance. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. The site uses canonical URLs and Open Graph tags for social media sharing. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies, but the absence of security headers and privacy compliance features indicates areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nonsense.tv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nonsense.tv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.