Skip to main content

Security report for noemarch.cz

Restaurant & Design Hotel Noem Arch · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Noem Arch is a small hospitality business based in Brno, Czech Republic, offering hotel accommodation, restaurant dining, and conference facilities. The website is built on TYPO3 CMS and integrates common marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK. The site includes cookie consent and privacy policies, indicating awareness of GDPR compliance. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. The website is professionally designed with good navigation and content quality, targeting general audiences interested in hospitality services. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement, particularly in implementing security headers and publishing explicit security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching noemarch.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention noemarch.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for noemarch.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector with a focus on local/regional clientele in Brno. Its business model centers on providing accommodation, dining, and event hosting services. The website reflects a professional brand with consistent design and clear contact information. The use of third-party marketing and analytics services suggests a moderate digital maturity. The lack of WHOIS data and security policies may impact trust from more security-conscious customers. No affiliate or partner domains were identified beyond design and marketing agencies involved in website creation.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, which are positive security indicators. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which are recommended best practices. There is no publicly available security or incident response policy, nor a vulnerability disclosure program. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adopting additional security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  4. Improve accessibility features to enhance compliance and user experience.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Restaurant & Design Hotel Noem Arch
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Restaurant & Design Hotel Noem Arch
Description
Noem Arch is a restaurant and design hotel located in Brno, Czech Republic, offering hospitality services including hotel accommodation, restaurant dining, and conference facilities.
Key services
Hotel accommodation, Restaurant services, Conference facilities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK, EasyCookie Consent
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK, FastBooking tracking pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and accessible
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  5. Use of modern CMS TYPO3 and standard marketing/analytics tools
  6. No security headers detected in HTML source, potential improvement area
  7. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address
  8. No forms detected that collect personal data directly on the homepage
  9. Social media presence on Facebook is linked
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, a mature open-source content management system. It uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK for analytics and marketing. The site loads multiple external CSS and JS resources from reputable CDNs. Performance is moderate with some large background images used for visual appeal. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags. No hosting provider information was detected. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies, but security headers are missing which is a technical risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with noemarch.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review noemarch.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.