Skip to main content

Security report for noedhjaelp.dk

Folkekirkens Nødhjælp · Non-profit · Denmark

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Folkekirkens Nødhjælp is a well-established Danish non-profit humanitarian organization operating since 1922, focused on disaster relief, combating inequality, and building resilient communities both in Denmark and internationally. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, comprehensive content, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities, enhanced by modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools such as Matomo and Google Tag Manager. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data slightly reduces domain trust but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and improving visible contact information to bolster trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of noedhjaelp.dk. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching noedhjaelp.dk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
88
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention noedhjaelp.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
11
Employees
0
Customers
11
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for noedhjaelp.dk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong market position as a leading humanitarian NGO in Denmark with operations in 19 countries. Its business model is donation and aid-driven, targeting general public donors and stakeholders interested in social impact. The website supports this with clear messaging, social media integration, and e-commerce for fundraising. Partnerships with cookie consent and analytics providers indicate a commitment to privacy and compliance. Growth indicators include active digital marketing and analytics usage. The lack of visible direct contact info may be a minor barrier for some users. Overall, the organization demonstrates a robust operational and digital ecosystem aligned with its mission.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent compliant with GDPR, and use of privacy-respecting analytics (Matomo with disabled cookies). No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of some security headers (e.g., X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) and lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness. The WHOIS data absence is a concern for domain trust but may be due to privacy protection. Recommendations include implementing missing headers, publishing security documentation, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure channel.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Improve visibility of official contact information including emails and phone numbers for trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Folkekirkens Nødhjælp
Description
Folkekirkens Nødhjælp har en unik position både i Danmark og i de 19 lande, vi opererer i. Vi redder liv. Vi bekæmper ulighed. Og vi opbygger robuste samfund
Key services
Humanitarian aid, Disaster relief, Community development, Inequality reduction
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Swiper.js, FKN Theme and Plugins, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare
Frameworks
WooCommerce, FKN custom plugins
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Matomo with disabled cookies for privacy

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo Analytics
Marketing tools
Sleeknote
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed cookie categories and third-party disclosures.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage or metadata.
  4. Strong use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and business identity.
  5. Use of multiple third-party services for analytics and marketing with privacy considerations.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual for a DK domain and may indicate privacy protection or registration issues.
  7. Website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and accessible.
  8. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  9. No terms of service page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, supported by custom FKN theme and plugins. It leverages popular JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Swiper.js for UI components. Analytics are handled via Matomo and Google Tag Manager, with privacy considerations such as disabled cookies in Matomo. Hosting appears to be behind Cloudflare CDN, enhancing performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with opportunities to optimize loading times further. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100 −1Medium30 findingsView report
  2. 63/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with noedhjaelp.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review noedhjaelp.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.