Skip to main content

Security report for noedhjaelp.dk

Folkekirkens Nødhjælp · Non-profit · Denmark

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Folkekirkens Nødhjælp is a well-established Danish non-profit humanitarian organization operating since 1922, focused on disaster relief, fighting inequality, and building resilient communities both in Denmark and internationally. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with comprehensive content in Danish, targeting donors, volunteers, and stakeholders interested in humanitarian aid. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities, uses modern JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js, and integrates privacy-conscious analytics via Matomo. The site enforces HTTPS and implements a detailed cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR, demonstrating a mature approach to privacy and user data protection. However, the absence of publicly available WHOIS data due to privacy protection limits domain registration transparency. Security posture is solid with encrypted connections and no visible vulnerabilities, but could be improved by adding explicit security headers and publishing security policies or incident response contacts. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and well-suited for its non-profit mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching noedhjaelp.dk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
88
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention noedhjaelp.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
11
Employees
0
Customers
11
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for noedhjaelp.dk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong market position as a leading Danish humanitarian aid entity with a long history and broad international operations. Its business model is donation and aid-driven, supported by fundraising subdomains and partnerships with cookie consent and marketing service providers. The website's content and social media presence reinforce its credibility and outreach. The lack of direct contact information on the site may be intentional to streamline communication through other channels. The use of WooCommerce suggests some e-commerce or donation processing capabilities. The partnership ecosystem includes cookie management and marketing tools, enhancing compliance and user engagement. Growth indicators include active content updates and integration of modern web technologies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and privacy-respecting analytics. The cookie consent banner provides granular control, aligning with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public security policy or incident response information is available, which could hinder transparency and trust in case of incidents. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Add security HTTP headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information availability to improve user trust and support accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Folkekirkens Nødhjælp
Description
Folkekirkens Nødhjælp har en unik position både i Danmark og i de 19 lande, vi opererer i. Vi redder liv. Vi bekæmper ulighed. Og vi opbygger robuste samfund
Key services
Humanitarian aid, Disaster relief, Community development, Inequality reduction
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Swiper.js, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, CookieInformation Consent Management
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular consent options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Matomo with disabled cookies for privacy

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Sleeknote
Marketing tools
Sleeknote
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Danish language
  2. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  4. No WHOIS data available, likely privacy protected or registry limitation
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics with privacy considerations
  6. No security policy or incident response information publicly available
  7. No terms of service page detected
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. Social media presence confirmed via Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn links
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce integration, leveraging jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js for UI components. It uses Matomo for privacy-focused analytics and Google Tag Manager for tag management. Cookie consent is managed via CookieInformation, providing a compliant and user-friendly consent mechanism. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with multiple external resources loaded from CDNs. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available, but Cloudflare is likely used for CDN and security services. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence suitable for a large non-profit organization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100 −1Medium30 findingsView report
  2. 63/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with noedhjaelp.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review noedhjaelp.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.