Skip to main content

Security report for nnip.com

Goldman Sachs Asset Management · Finance · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Goldman Sachs Asset Management operates a professional website targeting financial intermediaries and advisors, offering asset and investment management services. The site is branded consistently with Goldman Sachs and positions itself as a leading global asset manager. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted likely via Akamai, with performance monitoring implemented through Akamai mPulse. The website is well-optimized for mobile and accessibility, with good SEO practices evident. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and modern TLS usage, though explicit security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. The WHOIS data is unavailable for the subdomain, consistent with it being a subdomain under the main gs.com domain, which is owned by Goldman Sachs. Overall, the site is legitimate, professional, and secure, but could improve privacy compliance disclosures and incident response transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nnip.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
70
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as a portal for financial intermediaries, reflecting Goldman Sachs Asset Management's enterprise-scale operations in the finance sector. The business model focuses on asset management and investment services, targeting institutional and intermediary clients. The site demonstrates strong branding and market positioning as a global leader. The absence of explicit contact information and compliance pages in the provided content suggests these may be located elsewhere or require authentication. The use of advanced web technologies and global CDN services indicates a mature digital presence. No suspicious or unrelated domains were found linked, supporting a focused business ecosystem.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with modern TLS 1.3, indicating strong baseline security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML snippet. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are visible, which could hinder rapid response to security issues. Privacy compliance indicators such as cookie banners or GDPR statements are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in regulatory adherence. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Conduct regular security audits to ensure no vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data exist.
  5. Enhance transparency by linking to terms of service and data protection officer contact details.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
Goldman Sachs Asset Management
Registration number
201329851H
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Goldman Sachs Asset Management
Description
As one of the world’s leading asset managers, our mission is to help you achieve your investment goals.
Key services
Investment management, Asset management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS, Akamai (implied by script source), Boomerang (performance monitoring)
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of modern TLS (TLS 1.3)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Akamai mPulse
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TrustArc, Akamai mPulse
Marketing tools
TrustArc consent management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional asset management portal for financial intermediaries
  2. No WHOIS data available for the subdomain, consistent with subdomain usage
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in provided HTML snippet
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML snippet
  5. Modern web technologies and performance monitoring scripts are in use
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  7. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  8. Limited visible compliance disclosures in the provided content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, primarily Next.js and React, enabling server-side rendering and good performance. Hosting appears to be via Akamai CDN, ensuring global availability and resilience. Performance monitoring is implemented using Akamai mPulse, indicating active performance management. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter cards. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The technical implementation is robust with opportunities to improve security headers and privacy disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nnip.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nnip.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.