Skip to main content

Security report for nlutikova.com

Lutikova · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.nlutikova.com represents a private psychological practice based in Daugavpils, Latvia, operated under the name Lutikova. The business offers short-term therapy services for emotional and neurotic disorders, providing both online and in-person consultations. The site is professionally designed using the Wix platform and targets individuals seeking mental health support locally. Technically, the website leverages Wix's infrastructure and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and visible security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. The domain WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy, though the website content and business information appear credible and consistent with a small healthcare provider. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nlutikova.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small private healthcare provider specializing in psychological therapy in Latvia. Its market position is local and focused on individual clients seeking mental health services. The business model is direct service provision with revenue likely generated from therapy sessions. The website's use of Wix indicates a cost-effective digital presence strategy. The absence of WHOIS data may indicate recent domain registration or privacy protection, which should be clarified for trust. The company maintains clear contact information and uses standard web analytics tools. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth potential may be limited by local market size but could be expanded via online consultations.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No visible security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics introduces moderate tracking but no known vulnerabilities were detected. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better header implementation, privacy transparency, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lutikova
Description
Īstermiņa terapija emocionāliem un neirotiskiem traucējumiem. Izvēlieties ērtāko konsultācijas formātu: Tiešsaistes konsultāciju vai Personīgu tikšanos
Key services
Short-term therapy for emotional and neurotic disorders, Online consultations, In-person consultations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with professional design.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  3. No visible privacy or cookie policy found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone and physical address.
  5. No security policy or incident response information is present.
  6. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No signs of adult or explicit content; content is safe.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, utilizing Wix's hosting and content delivery infrastructure. It uses modern web technologies and polyfills for compatibility. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design principles. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML or CSS. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO metadata is included but could be enhanced with more comprehensive content and structured data. The lack of advanced security headers and privacy mechanisms represents technical debt. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business site but has room for security and privacy improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nlutikova.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nlutikova.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.