Skip to main content

Security report for nkgev.info

Niedersächsische Krankenhausgesellschaft e.V. · Healthcare · Germany

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Niedersächsische Krankenhausgesellschaft e.V. (NKG) is a large non-profit association representing all hospitals in the German state of Niedersachsen. It serves as a key stakeholder in healthcare policy, hospital advocacy, and member services, supporting over 159 hospitals and approximately 120,000 employees. The website provides comprehensive information about the association's goals, committees, health policy positions, and services such as hospital search and seminars. The target audience includes healthcare professionals, hospital administrators, policymakers, and patients within Niedersachsen. Technically, the website is built on the Contao Open Source CMS platform and employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper.js, and Mmenu for enhanced user experience. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and accessibility features, although some improvements in accessibility could be made. The site uses HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and implements cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. Security-wise, the site demonstrates good practices including CSRF protection cookies and HTTPS enforcement. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or vulnerability disclosure program. The WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, which slightly reduces domain trustworthiness, but the professional presentation and clear contact details support legitimacy. Overall, the website is a credible and professional digital presence for a significant healthcare association in Germany, with moderate technical sophistication and good privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response transparency are recommended to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nkgev.info

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nkgev.info, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for nkgev.info right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NKG holds a leading position as the umbrella organization for hospitals in Niedersachsen, Germany. Its business model focuses on advocacy, policy influence, and member support rather than commercial activities. The association's revenue streams likely include membership fees and government grants. The website indicates strong partnerships with regional healthcare institutions and government bodies. The organization targets hospital administrators, healthcare professionals, and policymakers, emphasizing healthcare system stability and reform. Growth indicators include active campaigns and policy statements. The partnership ecosystem includes regional funds, medical societies, and hospital quality initiatives. The website content and structure reflect a mature organization with a clear mission and stable market presence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security posture. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented with clear information on essential and functional cookies. CSRF protection cookies are present, indicating awareness of common web security threats. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page is found, limiting transparency for security researchers. No incident response contacts or security policies are published. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the site is secure for general use but could improve in transparency and header security.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party libraries and update to latest secure versions to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Niedersächsische Krankenhausgesellschaft e.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Niedersächsische Krankenhausgesellschaft e.V.
Description
Die Niedersächsische Krankenhausgesellschaft (NKG) ist der Zusammenschluss aller Krankenhäuser in Niedersachsen mit rund 40.000 Betten. Mehr als 1,5 Mio. Patientinnen und Patienten werden pro Jahr in den niedersächsischen Krankenhäusern stationär behandelt. Die Einrichtungen sind zugleich einer der bedeutendsten Arbeitgeber Niedersachsens.
Key services
Representation of hospitals, Health policy advocacy, Information and service provision, Seminars and training, Hospital search services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Mmenu, Swiper.js, Contao CMS, CountUp.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • CSRF protection cookies in use

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable or malformed, limiting domain trust verification.
  4. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, and physical address.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  8. No analytics or tracking services detected beyond cookie consent.
  9. Content is focused on healthcare and hospital association activities in Niedersachsen, Germany.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Contao CMS, a PHP-based open-source content management system, combined with modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper.js for sliders, and Mmenu for mobile navigation. The site uses responsive design techniques and serves optimized images with WebP support. Performance is moderate, with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy resources detected. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format, although the structured data is minimal. The site uses a cookie consent banner with granular control, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and expanded structured data for richer search engine results.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nkgev.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nkgev.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.