Skip to main content

Security report for niob.app

Niob Finance · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Niob Finance operates NIOB Swap, a decentralized exchange and liquidity acquisition yield farming platform primarily on Binance Smart Chain. The platform offers a suite of DeFi services including token swapping, liquidity provision, farming, prediction trading, token migration, and a referral program. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, targeting crypto traders and DeFi users. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks such as React and integrates wallet connection libraries like RainbowKit, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Google Analytics is employed for user tracking, though privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies. No contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which may impact user trust. The domain uses privacy protection common in crypto projects, which is justified but reduces transparency. Overall, the site is functional and safe but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching niob.app

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Niob Finance positions itself in the competitive DeFi market with a focus on Binance Smart Chain users. Its business model revolves around decentralized liquidity farming, token exchange, and prediction trading, monetizing through transaction fees and tokenomics mechanisms such as transfer taxes. The referral program incentivizes user growth and network effects. The company maintains an active presence on GitHub, Medium, Twitter, and Telegram, supporting community engagement and transparency. The lack of explicit company registration or physical address information is typical in the crypto space but may limit institutional trust. The platform's integration with multiple subdomains for exchange, dashboard, and prediction trading indicates a modular service architecture. Growth potential depends on expanding user base and maintaining security and compliance standards.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and content injection. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, limiting transparency in security management. The use of wallet connection libraries suggests awareness of secure user authentication practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is weak, with no cookie consent or privacy policy, which may expose the platform to regulatory risks under GDPR or similar frameworks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in headers, policies, and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance web security.
  3. Publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to increase transparency and user trust.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Niob Finance
Description
NIOB Swap is a decentralized exchange and automatic liquidity acquisition yield farm operating on Binance Smart Chain. The platform offers services including token exchange, liquidity provision, farming, prediction trading, token migration, and referral rewards.
Key services
Decentralized Exchange (DEX), Liquidity Acquisition Yield Farming, Prediction Trading, Token Migration, Referral Program
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React, CSS, Google Analytics, RainbowKit (wallet connection UI)
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Binance Smart Chain
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of wallet connection libraries (RainbowKit)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a decentralized finance platform focused on Binance Smart Chain.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. Multiple external links to official docs, GitHub, social media, and related subdomains.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and wallet connection libraries.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking user behavior.
  7. No visible security headers in HTML content; SSL is enabled.
  8. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; full content accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React and modern JavaScript modules, indicating a contemporary front-end architecture. It leverages wallet connection frameworks like RainbowKit for blockchain interactions. Google Analytics is integrated for user behavior tracking. The site appears moderately performant with responsive design for mobile devices. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident from the HTML content. The lack of visible security headers and privacy policies suggests technical debt in compliance and security best practices. Opportunities exist to improve SEO metadata, accessibility, and security configurations to reduce risks and enhance operational resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with niob.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review niob.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.