Skip to main content

Security report for nike.com

Nike · Retail · Finland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nike's Finnish website presents a professional and comprehensive e-commerce platform for sportswear and athletic products. The site leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js frameworks, supported by robust analytics and performance monitoring tools such as New Relic and Adobe. The website is well-optimized for mobile and desktop, providing a seamless user experience with clear navigation and rich content. Security measures are evident through HTTPS enforcement, CSP monitoring, and secure script loading, although explicit security policy pages and incident response contacts are not publicly visible. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting Nike's commitment to data protection. Overall, the site reflects Nike's strong market position as a global leader in retail sportswear, with a mature digital infrastructure and high trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of nike.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nike.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nike operates as a global enterprise in the retail sector, focusing on sportswear, footwear, and athletic equipment. The Finnish site targets athletes and consumers interested in premium sports products, supporting direct-to-consumer sales through an advanced e-commerce platform. Nike's business model emphasizes brand strength, innovation, and customer experience. The website's integration with multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a data-driven approach to customer engagement and performance optimization. The absence of direct contact information on the main site suggests reliance on centralized customer service channels. Nike's extensive use of subdomains for secure transactions and analytics underscores a sophisticated digital ecosystem supporting its retail operations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Content Security Policy, and monitoring for CSP violations. The presence of New Relic and Adobe analytics is managed securely without exposing sensitive data. No vulnerabilities or security misconfigurations were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of a publicly accessible security policy or incident response contact limits transparency for security researchers and customers. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which is common for large brands using privacy or registry restrictions, but this does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Recommendations include publishing a security policy and vulnerability disclosure to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information or a security@ email address.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance transparency around data retention and privacy practices beyond GDPR compliance.
  5. Maintain continuous monitoring for third-party script security and update dependencies regularly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nike
Description
Nike delivers innovative products, experiences and services to inspire athletes.
Key services
Sportswear products, Footwear, Athletic equipment, Online shopping experience
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, React (implied by Next.js usage), New Relic monitoring, Adobe optimization, Brightcove video platform
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSP violation monitoring
  • Use of security event listeners
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic, Segment.io, Adobe Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic, Segment.io, Facebook Connect, Adobe
Marketing tools
Adobe Optimization, New Relic Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available from raw output, likely due to registry restrictions.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on the main page.
  6. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  8. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

Nike's Finnish website is built on a modern tech stack featuring React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and fast performance. The site uses advanced analytics and monitoring tools including New Relic and Adobe Optimization, ensuring high availability and performance insights. Static assets are served via Nike's CDN infrastructure, contributing to fast load times and global reach. Accessibility and SEO best practices are implemented, with proper meta tags and responsive design. The site uses DNS prefetching and resource preloading to optimize user experience. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Overall, the technical implementation is robust, scalable, and aligned with enterprise-grade e-commerce standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low26 findingsView report
  2. 65/100Medium6 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nike.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nike.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.