Skip to main content

Security report for nike.com

Nike, Inc. · Retail · Finland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nike, Inc. operates a globally recognized e-commerce platform delivering innovative sportswear, footwear, and related services. The Finnish localized site targets athletes and consumers in Finland, offering a comprehensive product range with a strong brand presence. The website leverages modern web technologies including React and Next.js frameworks, supported by advanced analytics and performance monitoring tools such as New Relic and Adobe Experience Platform. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, comprehensive security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data is likely due to registry privacy policies and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Overall, Nike's digital infrastructure demonstrates high maturity, supporting a seamless and secure user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nike.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nike holds a dominant market position in the global sportswear retail sector, operating an enterprise-scale e-commerce platform. The business model focuses on direct-to-consumer sales via online channels, supported by strong brand equity and extensive product offerings. The Finnish site reflects localization efforts for regional markets, including language and currency adaptation. Nike's partnership ecosystem includes secure payment and analytics services, enhancing operational efficiency and customer insights. Growth indicators include advanced digital marketing and tracking technologies, enabling targeted campaigns and user engagement. Strategic observations highlight Nike's investment in technology and data-driven decision-making to maintain competitive advantage.

Security posture

Nike's website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), and no detected exposed sensitive data. The use of reputable third-party monitoring and analytics tools is balanced with privacy considerations. However, the site lacks publicly visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure pages, which could enhance transparency and trust. No critical vulnerabilities or compliance gaps were identified in the analyzed content. The security culture appears strong, supported by continuous monitoring and best practices in web security.

Recommendations

  1. Establish and publicize a dedicated vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting.
  2. Enhance visibility of incident response contacts or security policies to improve stakeholder trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Maintain up-to-date security headers and monitor for emerging threats.
  5. Continue investment in privacy compliance and user consent mechanisms aligned with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nike, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nike, Inc.
Description
Nike delivers innovative products, experiences and services to inspire athletes.
Key services
Online retail of footwear, Apparel, Sports equipment, Customer experience and services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), New Relic monitoring, Brightcove video player, Adobe Experience Platform, Google Tag Manager, Segment analytics, DNS prefetching
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web, Mobile Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of CSP

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic, Segment, Adobe Experience Platform, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adobe Experience Platform
Tracking pixels
New Relic, Segment, Facebook Connect
Marketing tools
Adobe Experience Platform, Segment
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Content is professional, well-structured, and targeted to Finnish market
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present
  5. No security or privacy red flags detected in page content
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to registry redaction
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React/Next.js stack, optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness. Hosting appears to leverage Akamai CDN services, ensuring fast global delivery. The integration of advanced analytics and monitoring tools like New Relic and Adobe Experience Platform indicates a high level of digital maturity. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are evident through proper meta tags and responsive design. Technical risks are minimal, though continuous monitoring of third-party scripts is advised to prevent vulnerabilities. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a scalable, secure, and user-friendly e-commerce experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium29 findingsView report
  2. 65/100Medium6 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nike.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nike.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.