Skip to main content

Security report for nicecotedazur-greeters.com

Office de tourisme Nice Côte d'Azur · Hospitality · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.nicecotedazur-greeters.com represents the official platform for the Nice Côte d'Azur Greeters, a volunteer-based cultural tourism initiative affiliated with the local tourism office. It offers visitors the opportunity to meet local volunteers ('Greeters') who provide free guided walks sharing their passion and knowledge of Nice and the surrounding Côte d'Azur region. The site is well-branded, professionally designed, and targets tourists seeking authentic local experiences. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and WP Rocket, ensuring good SEO and performance. The presence of Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot indicates a moderate level of user tracking balanced with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, though explicit security headers are not detected in the provided data. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly, reducing transparency and trust in domain registration details. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and serves a niche non-profit hospitality sector effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nicecotedazur-greeters.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a non-profit cultural tourism facilitator under the Office de tourisme Nice Côte d'Azur. It leverages a network of local volunteers to enhance visitor experiences through personalized walks. The business model is community-driven and relies on volunteer engagement rather than direct revenue. The website supports this by providing booking capabilities and educational content about the Greeter concept. The market position is strong locally with international affiliation, enhancing credibility. Partnerships with related tourism and cultural sites further strengthen its ecosystem. The target audience includes tourists interested in cultural immersion and local insights. The site’s content and social media presence indicate active engagement and trustworthiness.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in hardening the site against common web attacks. The use of multiple third-party scripts and ad/tracking services introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing monitoring. No explicit incident response or security policy information is found, indicating a gap in transparency for security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve site security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and minimize third-party scripts to reduce attack surface and improve performance.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to improve domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Office de tourisme Nice Côte d'Azur
Description
Les Greeters sont des bénévoles locaux qui offer free guided walks sharing their passion and knowledge of Nice and the Côte d'Azur region. The website promotes meeting Greeters, booking walks, and learning about the concept and values of Greeters.
Key services
Connecting visitors with local volunteer Greeters, Booking guided walks, Providing information about Greeter concept and values
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Swiper.js, UIkit
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
AppNexus (secure.adnxs.com)
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, 5mcl.fr
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Content is focused on local volunteer tourism services in Nice, France.
  3. Strong social media presence and official tourism office branding.
  4. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is used.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces trust in domain registration transparency.
  7. Multiple third-party scripts and ad/tracking services are used.
  8. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO for search optimization and WP Rocket for caching and performance improvements. It uses UIkit for UI components and Swiper.js for sliders. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot are integrated for analytics and cookie consent management. The site loads asynchronously many scripts and uses lazy loading for images, improving performance. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly. However, no hosting provider information is directly available. The site performance is moderate with good SEO practices but could benefit from further optimization and security header implementation. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, suitable for a small to medium-sized non-profit tourism website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nicecotedazur-greeters.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nicecotedazur-greeters.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.