Skip to main content

Security report for nibe.com

NIBE Industrier AB · Energy · Sweden

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and DNS health.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NIBE Industrier AB is a large enterprise specializing in sustainable energy solutions, including climate solutions, heating elements, and stoves. The company positions itself as a global player focused on reducing greenhouse gas emissions through innovative products and corporate sustainability. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive corporate governance, investor relations, and sustainability content. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including SiteVision CMS, Google Tag Manager, and UIkit CSS framework, delivering good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the professional presentation and content. Strategic recommendations include publishing security and incident response policies, adding a security.txt file, and improving transparency around data protection officer contact details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 13 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nibe.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
90
Email security
80
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NIBE operates in the energy sector with a focus on sustainable and energy-efficient products. The business model revolves around manufacturing and distributing climate solutions and heating products. The company targets both commercial and residential customers interested in sustainability. Its market position is strong, supported by multiple subsidiaries and a global footprint. The website content and navigation are well-structured, supporting investor and governance transparency. The company leverages digital marketing tools and analytics to monitor engagement. Growth indicators include acquisitions and expansion into new markets. No suspicious or unrelated domains were found linked to the site, indicating a focused partnership ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and presence of security headers inferred. Cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure channels suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data is a minor concern but does not indicate immediate risk. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing more detailed security governance documents and contact points.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and readiness.
  2. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Add clear contact information for the Data Protection Officer to enhance GDPR compliance.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to ensure no vulnerable libraries are used.
  5. Enhance WHOIS data transparency if possible to improve domain trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NIBE Industrier AB
Description
NIBE Industrier AB focuses on world-class sustainable energy solutions contributing to global greenhouse gas emission reduction goals.
Key services
Climate Solutions, Heating Elements, Stoves
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, SiteVision CMS, Font Awesome, UIkit CSS Framework
Frameworks
SiteVision
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Ahrefs Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Ahrefs Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is comprehensive and professionally presented.
  3. Strong focus on sustainability and corporate governance.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms are implemented.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in provided HTML snippet.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a .com domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the SiteVision CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and UIkit for UI components. Google Tag Manager and Ahrefs Analytics are used for tracking and marketing insights. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with preloading of key scripts and stylesheets. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided HTML. Hosting provider details were not explicitly found. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable digital presence suitable for an enterprise-level company.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nibe.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nibe.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.