Skip to main content

Security report for neznamekrkonose.cz

Hospitality · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Neznámé Krkonoše is a small regional tourism website focused on promoting lesser-known locations in the Krkonoše mountains of the Czech Republic. The site provides travel tips, accommodation listings, event information, and partners with regional organizations to enhance visitor experience. The business model centers on content provision and partner sponsorships, targeting tourists interested in exploring this specific region. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Modern Events Calendar Lite and Contact Form 7, enhanced by Google reCAPTCHA and Google Analytics for security and analytics respectively. The site is hosted likely by WEDOS, a Czech hosting provider, and uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and spam protection but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent banner but no visible privacy policy or terms of service pages. Overall, the website is functional and professional for its niche but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching neznamekrkonose.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche position in the regional tourism sector, focusing on the Krkonoše mountain area. It leverages partnerships with local organizations to build credibility and provide comprehensive travel information. The business model appears to be content-driven with potential revenue from partner promotions or advertising. The target audience is tourists and visitors seeking less mainstream travel destinations. The site’s founding in 2020 aligns with its domain age and regional focus. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized regional entities, enhancing trustworthiness. Growth indicators are limited but the site maintains a consistent brand presence and moderate content quality.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The site enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from spam. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain web attacks. No incident response or security policy pages are present, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanism is found. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism but no privacy policy or terms of service. The absence of explicit contact emails or phone numbers reduces transparency. Overall, the site is reasonably secure for a small informational website but would benefit from enhanced security practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve transparency and credibility.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website focused on promoting lesser-known places in the Krkonoše mountains, providing tips, accommodation options, events, and travel advice.
Key services
Travel tips and advice, Accommodation listings (hotels, chalets, pensions), Event information, Partner promotions
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.8.1, jQuery 3.6.0, Modern Events Calendar Lite plugin, Contact Form 7 plugin, Elementor page builder, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Fonts, Bootstrap CSS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based regional tourism information portal.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via CookieYes.
  4. Contact information is primarily via a contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in the HTML.
  5. Google Analytics is used with IP anonymization enabled.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  7. Site uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection on forms.
  8. Partner logos link to relevant regional organizations.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. No visible security or incident response policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard WordPress CMS with popular plugins for event management and contact forms. It employs modern front-end technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap CSS, and Google Fonts. The site is mobile optimized and uses Google Analytics with IP anonymization for user tracking. Hosting is likely provided by WEDOS, a Czech hosting provider, consistent with the domain registrar. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and structured data such as JSON-LD for SEO enhancement. There is room for technical modernization by implementing accessibility improvements and SEO best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with neznamekrkonose.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review neznamekrkonose.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.