Skip to main content

Security report for nextcity.org

Next City, Inc. · Media · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Next City, Inc. is a well-established nonprofit media organization founded in 2012, dedicated to publishing solutions-oriented journalism focused on urban transportation, housing, environment, and social justice. The website serves a target audience of urban planners, policymakers, activists, and engaged citizens, offering a variety of content formats including news articles, podcasts, webinars, ebooks, and events. The business model relies on memberships, donations, institutional support, and sponsored content, positioning Next City as a trusted voice in the urban equity media space. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including JavaScript, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, and Stripe for payments, hosted behind Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services. The site is built on the ExpressionEngine CMS and demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses CSRF tokens in forms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. DNSSEC is not enabled, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected, which may affect GDPR compliance. Overall, Next City presents a professional, trustworthy, and content-rich platform with a solid business foundation. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and transparency around incident response would enhance its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nextcity.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Next City holds a strong market position as a nonprofit urban news publisher with a focus on equitable city solutions. Its competitive advantage lies in its solutions journalism approach and diverse content offerings. Revenue streams include memberships, donations, institutional memberships, and sponsored content. The organization targets urban professionals and socially conscious audiences, with growth indicators seen in active event hosting and digital content expansion. Partnerships with job and shop subdomains and event platforms indicate a broad ecosystem supporting its mission. Operationally, the organization maintains consistent branding and high content quality, reinforcing its credibility and audience trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection on forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. The lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but would benefit from enhanced header implementation, formal policies, and compliance improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  3. Add explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent banner/mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user privacy transparency.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Next City, Inc.
Description
Next City is a nonprofit news organization that publishes stories on solutions to pressing urban issues, focusing on equitable cities, urban transportation, housing, environment, and social justice.
Key services
News articles, Podcasts, Webinars, Ebooks, Events, Membership programs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Font Awesome 6 Pro, Google Tag Manager, Google Publisher Tags, Typekit Fonts, Stripe Payment API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of CSRF tokens in forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional nonprofit media platform focused on urban issues and equitable city development.
  2. Content is rich and well-structured with multiple sections including news, podcasts, webinars, ebooks, and events.
  3. Strong social media presence with links to major platforms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and third-party services for analytics and advertising.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner found, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  6. WHOIS privacy protection is used but justified given nonprofit nature.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information published.
  8. Forms use CSRF tokens indicating some security awareness.
  9. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ExpressionEngine CMS and uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery and Font Awesome 6 Pro icons. It integrates third-party services such as Google Tag Manager, Google Publisher Tags for advertising, Stripe for payment processing, and Typekit for fonts. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site uses CSRF tokens in forms indicating some security awareness. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization in accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nextcity.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nextcity.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.