Skip to main content

Security report for newyorker.de

NEW YORKER · Retail · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NEW YORKER operates as a large retail fashion brand primarily targeting young adults with a focus on trendy clothing for men and women. The website serves as a digital storefront with multilingual support, reflecting an established presence in Germany and other international markets. The business model centers on e-commerce complemented by physical retail stores, offering various branded collections. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting a positive user experience.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of newyorker.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching newyorker.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention newyorker.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
33,696
Employees
19
Customers
33,538
Third parties
139
Weak passwords
9%

Latest record dated 2026-05-31 · 28 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for newyorker.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –emeam42store.emea.company.newyorker.de2026-05-31
  • –silverback.newyorker.de2026-05-21
  • –silverback.newyorker.de2026-05-21
  • –silverback.newyorker.de2026-04-25
  • –ck.newyorker.de2026-01-12

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in the European fashion retail sector, leveraging multiple brand lines to appeal to diverse customer segments. The website's multilingual country picker indicates a broad geographic reach. While direct contact information is not prominently displayed on the landing page, legal pages provide privacy and imprint details, supporting regulatory compliance. The absence of visible certifications or security policies suggests opportunities for enhanced trust signals. The business ecosystem appears focused on retail without evident partnerships or subsidiaries disclosed on the site.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and modern web technologies, including JavaScript modules and static site generation, contributing to a secure and performant platform. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and no dedicated security or incident response policies are publicly available. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, indicating GDPR awareness. The security posture is solid but could be improved by adding security headers, explicit policies, and regular third-party script audits to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding visible trust indicators such as certifications or customer testimonials to strengthen business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NEW YORKER
Description
Entdecke die neuesten Modetrends für Damen und Herren bei NEW YORKER. Kleidung von AMISU, CENSORED, FISHBONE, SMOG und BLACK SQUAD.
Key services
Fashion retail for men and women, Online shopping platform, Brand collections including AMISU, CENSORED, FISHBONE, SMOG, BLACK SQUAD
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hugo static site generator, JavaScript modules, Alpine.js, Flatpickr date picker, Custom web components, CSS with SCSS preprocessing
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of modern JavaScript modules

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional fashion retail platform targeting German and multiple international markets.
  2. Content is well structured with comprehensive metadata and multilingual support.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the landing page; contact likely via legal pages.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and static site generation for performance.
  6. Cookie consent mechanism implemented via web components.
  7. No signs of adult or explicit content; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Hugo, a static site generator, combined with modern JavaScript frameworks like Alpine.js and custom web components. CSS is managed with SCSS preprocessing, and performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting details are not explicit, but the use of managed DNS servers suggests professional infrastructure. The site lacks some advanced accessibility features and security headers, representing areas for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with newyorker.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review newyorker.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.