Skip to main content

Security report for neutron.org

Neutron · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Neutron is a finance-focused open network platform that offers a suite of decentralized finance applications including trading, lending, staking, and smart contract infrastructure. The website positions Neutron as an innovative player in the DeFi space, emphasizing cross-chain scalability and composability of smart contracts. The platform targets crypto traders, developers, and entrepreneurs seeking efficient and integrated financial tools. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including Webflow CMS, GSAP animations, and Google Tag Manager for analytics, delivering a fast, mobile-optimized, and visually engaging user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and policies are absent. The lack of WHOIS data and absence of privacy and cookie policies slightly reduce trust and privacy compliance scores. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in the crypto finance sector, but could improve transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching neutron.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Neutron operates in the competitive DeFi and blockchain finance market, offering a comprehensive ecosystem of financial products such as perpetual trading, lending, and liquid staking. Its business model revolves around providing an open network infrastructure that supports smart contracts with cross-chain capabilities, appealing to developers and finance users alike. The company maintains active community engagement through social media channels like Twitter, Discord, and Telegram, fostering a vibrant ecosystem. While the website lacks explicit business registration or contact details, the professional presentation and ecosystem integrations suggest a legitimate and growth-oriented operation. The absence of WHOIS registrant data is common in crypto domains for privacy reasons but warrants cautious monitoring. The platform's partnerships and integrations with other crypto services enhance its market position and potential for expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries detected. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement in hardening the site against common web attacks. No published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program is evident, which are important for transparency and trust in the finance sector. The lack of contact information for security incidents further limits incident response readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a marketing site but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance and trust standards expected in financial services.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add explicit security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  5. Consider enabling DNSSEC and ensuring WHOIS data transparency where appropriate to enhance domain trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Neutron
Description
Neutron is an open network pioneering the future of finance with a robust and growing suite of applications.
Key services
Perpetuals trading, Self-repaying loans, Lending, Liquid staking, Cross-chain smart contracts, Bridging assets
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform), Lenis smooth scrolling, SplitType for text animation, jQuery 3.5.1, JavaScript ES6+
Frameworks
Webflow, GSAP
Platforms
Google Fonts, Cloudflare CDN (implied by domain and CDN URLs)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URLs)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms collecting sensitive personal data on homepage
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
adrbsl.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive animations.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to malformed WHOIS response.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found on homepage or navigation.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on homepage.
  5. Strong social media presence with official Twitter, Discord, and Telegram links.
  6. No forms present on homepage; external links lead to ecosystem apps and documentation.
  7. Modern front-end technologies and good SEO practices observed.
  8. No visible security policy or incident response information published.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern and performant technology stack including Webflow CMS for content management, GSAP for advanced animations, and Google Tag Manager for analytics integration. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and delivers a smooth user experience with features like smooth scrolling and text animation. Hosting appears to be via Webflow's infrastructure with CDN support, contributing to fast load times. No technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. However, the site lacks some security best practices such as security headers and documented compliance policies. The absence of forms on the homepage reduces attack surface but also limits direct user engagement channels. Overall, the technical implementation is robust and modern, supporting the business goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with neutron.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review neutron.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.