Skip to main content

Security report for nesto.lv

Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website nesto.lv presents a business focused on sustainable garden furniture crafted from metal, stone, and wood, produced locally in Latvia. The site targets general consumers interested in eco-friendly and design-oriented outdoor furniture. The content is primarily in Latvian and provides product descriptions but lacks detailed business or contact information. Technically, the site uses modern HTML5 and CSS3 with custom fonts, showing moderate mobile optimization and basic SEO practices. However, there is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, which raises concerns about the security posture. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating potential compliance gaps. Overall, the site appears legitimate but lacks transparency and security best practices, limiting trust and credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nesto.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nesto.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for nesto.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nesto.lv operates in the retail sector specializing in sustainable garden furniture. The business model likely revolves around direct sales of locally made furniture products. The market position is unclear due to limited information, but the focus on sustainability and local production may appeal to niche eco-conscious customers. No partnerships or certifications are evident from the content. The absence of contact details and policies suggests a small-scale operation with room for growth in digital maturity and customer engagement.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak due to missing HTTPS confirmation and lack of security headers. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No forms or input fields were detected to assess input validation or secure data handling. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in security and privacy to protect users and build trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.
  3. Include clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and publish a security.txt file.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Mēbeles no metāla, akmens un koka. Ilgtspējīgas dizaina mēbeles, kas radītas tepat Latvijā. Dārza mēbeles, šūpoles, akmens galdi u.c.
Key services
dārza mēbeles, šūpoles, akmens galdi
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, woff2 fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  2. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in HTML content.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links explicitly found.
  5. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  6. Website focuses on sustainable garden furniture made in Latvia.
  7. Content is in Latvian language.
  8. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in provided HTML snippet.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  10. Website design uses custom fonts and CSS variables.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with custom web fonts. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS indications. Performance appears moderate but could not be fully assessed due to limited data. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, suggesting minimal data collection. The site would benefit from improved SEO metadata and accessibility features to enhance user experience and search visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nesto.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nesto.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.