Skip to main content

Security report for neplop.com

中国卫生人才考试网 · Healthcare · China

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website '中国卫生人才考试网' (neplop.com) serves as a specialized information portal for healthcare professional qualification exams in China. It provides comprehensive resources including exam news, registration details, syllabi, score queries, and certificate collection information. The site targets healthcare professionals preparing for various levels of health technical qualification exams across multiple Chinese provinces. The business model is primarily informational, focusing on timely updates and exam-related services. The domain is newly registered in August 2024, consistent with the recent exam content and launch timeline. Technically, the website employs Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, hosted via Alibaba Cloud. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with a clean navigation structure and regularly updated content. However, some technical debt is evident, such as the use of an outdated jQuery version and lack of advanced security headers. Performance is moderate, and accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers, which lowers its security posture. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are provided, and cookie consent mechanisms are absent, indicating limited privacy compliance. The WHOIS data shows a consistent and legitimate registration with no privacy protection, appropriate for this business type. Overall, the website is functional and relevant for its niche audience but would benefit from enhanced security measures, privacy compliance improvements, and modernization of its technical stack to improve trust and resilience against threats.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching neplop.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention neplop.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for neplop.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site occupies a niche market in the Chinese healthcare education sector, providing centralized exam information for health professional qualifications. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating exam news, registration portals, and study materials for multiple provinces, serving a specialized audience of healthcare workers. Revenue streams are likely indirect, possibly through advertising or partnerships with educational entities. The partnership ecosystem includes related educational and exam information sites. Growth indicators include frequent content updates and regional subdomains. Strategic observations suggest the need to expand privacy and security features to align with increasing regulatory demands and user trust expectations.

Security posture

The current security maturity is basic. HTTPS is implemented, but the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options exposes the site to potential risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. The use of an outdated jQuery version may introduce vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are visible, limiting preparedness for security events. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no cookie consent or GDPR indicators. The site should prioritize implementing security best practices and privacy mechanisms to mitigate risks and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance browser security.
  3. Update jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to latest secure versions to avoid known vulnerabilities.
  4. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  5. Publish explicit security and privacy policies including incident response contacts to demonstrate security maturity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
中国卫生人才考试网
Description
中国卫生人才考试网,全国卫生专业技术资格考试官网入口,提供全国卫生专业技术资格考试报名,卫生职称考试报名,卫生中级职称考试大纲,卫生高级职称考试试题答案,卫生职称考试准考证打印、卫生职称考试成绩查询服务。
Key services
Exam news and updates, Exam registration information, Exam syllabus and study materials, Score and certificate query services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu linksubmit push.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Chinese healthcare professional exam information portal.
  2. Content is in Chinese and regularly updated with exam news.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected.
  4. No explicit security policies or incident response info found.
  5. Contact info includes a QQ email and a generic phone number.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. Uses Bootstrap and jQuery for frontend.
  8. No CMS detected.
  9. No advanced security headers or DNSSEC.
  10. ICP备案 number present indicating Chinese regulatory compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a classic Bootstrap and jQuery frontend stack, with no detected CMS. Hosting is via Alibaba Cloud, a reputable provider. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, with a responsive design and clear navigation. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version and lack of modern security headers indicate technical debt. Performance is average, with no advanced caching or CDN usage detected. Accessibility features are basic, suggesting room for improvement to meet modern standards. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with neplop.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review neplop.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.