Skip to main content

Security report for neoten.lv

NEOTEN · Energy · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NEOTEN is a Latvian company specializing in engine and turbocharger repair services for cogeneration units, with over 15 years of experience. The company operates a dedicated service station and emphasizes professionalism, confidentiality, and long-term partnerships. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and includes multiple contact methods and forms for customer engagement. Technically, the site uses WordPress with KingComposer and AjaxForm plugins, integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form security, and Google Maps for location display. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and cookie consent banner present. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust analysis. Overall, the site presents a credible and professional business presence with room for security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching neoten.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NEOTEN operates in the energy sector, focusing on engine and turbocharger repairs for industrial cogeneration units. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting industrial clients requiring maintenance and repair services. The company has a stable market position with over 15 years of experience and a clear focus on quality and confidentiality. The website supports business growth through accessible contact forms and a product catalogue hosted on a related domain. The absence of social media presence suggests a focus on direct B2B relationships. The company appears small-sized, with localized operations in Latvia. The website content and contact details reinforce the company's legitimacy and professionalism.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA to secure user interactions and data submissions. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could be a compliance gap. The forms collect personal data including file uploads, so ensuring backend security and data protection is critical. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional headers, documented policies, and regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention and processing practices.
  5. Consider adding social media or third-party trust signals to improve business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA «NEOTEN»
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NEOTEN
Description
NEOTEN specializes in repairing engines and turbochargers installed on cogeneration units, with over 15 years of experience. The company operates a service station for turbocharger repairs and emphasizes professionalism, confidentiality, and long-term cooperation with partners.
Key services
Engine repair, Turbocharger repair, Service station operations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google reCAPTCHA, Google Maps API, jQuery, Font Awesome, KingComposer (kc-css-system classes), AjaxForm component
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Privacy policy and cookie consent are implemented and visible.
  4. Multiple contact methods including email, phone, physical address, and forms are present.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. Use of Google reCAPTCHA and Google Maps API for security and UX.
  7. No social media links detected in the provided HTML.
  8. Forms collect personal data including name, phone, email, message, and file attachments (CV).
  9. Website uses WordPress with KingComposer and AjaxForm plugins.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is business-focused and professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using KingComposer and AjaxForm plugins, integrating Google services such as reCAPTCHA, Maps API, and Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses modern CSS and JavaScript libraries. Performance is moderate, with external dependencies on CDN-hosted resources. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but provides basic form validation and user feedback. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph properties but could be improved with structured data and richer metadata. The technical stack is standard for small to medium business websites, with opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with neoten.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review neoten.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.