Skip to main content

Security report for nemlig.com

Nemlig.com · Supermarkets · Denmark

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
4of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nemlig.com

This scan found 5 issues across 3 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
90
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a dominant market position in Denmark's online grocery retail sector, leveraging a broad product range and strong organic offerings to attract a wide customer base. Their business model focuses on direct-to-consumer online sales with home delivery, supported by a robust digital platform and integrated marketing ecosystem. The presence on major social media platforms and use of advanced analytics tools indicate a data-driven approach to customer engagement and growth. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation. The company maintains transparent privacy and cookie policies, enhancing customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

nemlig.com exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, cookie consent with granular user controls, and use of anti-CSRF tokens. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the site follows good security practices but could enhance its security maturity by formalizing policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact channels to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and monitor third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance data retention disclosures and privacy transparency to align with best GDPR practices.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
nemlig.com
Description
Danmarks førende online supermarked med over 9.000 varer og Danmarks største udvalg af økologisk frugt/grønt og kød.
Key services
Online grocery shopping, Home delivery, Organic product selection
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS (ng-controller), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Pingdom RUM, AB Tasty, Dynamicweb CMS, Sitecore, Cookie Information consent management
Frameworks
AngularJS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of anti-CSRF tokens (XSRF-TOKEN cookie)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Pingdom RUM, Sitecore Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
AB Tasty, Pingdom RUM
Marketing tools
AB Tasty
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed categories and third-party processors.
  2. Strong presence of privacy policy and GDPR compliance indicators.
  3. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools with transparency.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response contact found.
  5. No terms of service page detected in provided content.
  6. Clear contact phone number provided but no email contact explicitly found.
  7. Website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and professionally designed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nemlig.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nemlig.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.