Skip to main content

Security report for neiglobal.com

Neuroscience Education Institute · Healthcare · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Neuroscience Education Institute (NEI) operates a professional website offering membership-based access to neuroscience educational resources, including an extensive online library and discounted registrations for live and virtual events. The site targets healthcare professionals seeking to stay current in clinical practice. The business model centers on education and membership services within the healthcare sector. Technically, the website is built on the DotNetNuke CMS platform and integrates common analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Feathr, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site demonstrates good design quality and user experience but shows only basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS implied but lacking visible security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak, with no detected privacy or cookie policies and extensive user tracking. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, reducing overall trustworthiness despite the professional appearance of the site. Strategic recommendations include improving privacy compliance, publishing security and incident response policies, enhancing mobile and accessibility features, and investigating domain registration legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching neiglobal.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NEI positions itself as a specialized provider of neuroscience education, leveraging a membership model to deliver practical clinical resources and educational content. The target audience is healthcare professionals, particularly clinicians interested in neuroscience. The business benefits from a focused niche market with recurring revenue from memberships and event registrations. The website's integration of multiple tracking and marketing tools suggests an active approach to user engagement and marketing. However, the lack of visible contact information and corporate details limits transparency. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the provided data. The business appears medium-sized with consistent branding and good content relevance, supporting its market position as a credible educational provider.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications, but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are best practices for enhanced security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site uses secure forms with ASP.NET viewstate and event validation, indicating some level of input security. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates a gap in security governance and transparency. Extensive third-party tracking without clear privacy compliance raises privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in policy publication, header implementation, and privacy compliance to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance site security.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies with clear contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Investigate and resolve the lack of WHOIS registration data to confirm domain legitimacy and improve trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Neuroscience Education Institute
Description
NEI Membership gives you exclusive access to practical point-of-care resources, an extensive library of online education, and significant discounts on registration to our live and virtual events, all designed to help you stay current in your clinical practice.
Key services
Membership access, Online education library, Live and virtual event registrations, Discounts on educational events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
DotNetNuke (DNN)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Feathr
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Feathr
Marketing tools
Feathr
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or domain is unregistered, which is unusual for an active website.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies were found on the homepage HTML content.
  4. No explicit contact information such as emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Website uses multiple third-party tracking and analytics services, indicating extensive user tracking.
  6. Site is built on DotNetNuke CMS with standard JavaScript libraries and tracking pixels.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected in the HTML content.
  8. Branding is consistent with Neuroscience Education Institute, targeting healthcare professionals.
  9. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to basic, with room for improvement.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the DotNetNuke CMS platform, utilizing jQuery and several JavaScript libraries for UI and analytics. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Feathr, indicating a mature marketing infrastructure. The site uses ASP.NET web forms technology with viewstate and event validation for form security. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. SEO is supported by meta tags but could be improved with structured data and richer metadata. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with neiglobal.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review neiglobal.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.