Skip to main content

Security report for neiburgs.com

Neiburgs Hotel · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Neiburgs Hotel is a family-owned boutique hotel located in the heart of Riga Old Town, Latvia, offering 55 rooms, a restaurant, conference facilities, and wellness services. The website reflects a well-established hospitality business with a strong focus on mindful guest experiences and local cultural integration. The digital presence is professional, multilingual, and optimized for mobile users, supporting direct booking and showcasing the hotel’s amenities and location advantages. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Mailchimp for marketing, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections, though improvements such as DNSSEC and security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and a consent mechanism. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and aligned with the business’s market positioning.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching neiburgs.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The hotel targets tourists and business travelers seeking accommodation and dining in Riga’s UNESCO World Heritage Old Town. Its business model centers on hospitality services including lodging, dining, conferences, and wellness. The company leverages a family-owned heritage and a boutique market position emphasizing mindful hospitality and local culture. Revenue streams likely include room bookings, restaurant sales, event hosting, and spa services. The website supports direct booking and highlights seasonal menus and local ingredients, appealing to discerning guests. Social media presence and positive trust indicators support brand reputation. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections such as clientDeleteProhibited status. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no advanced security headers were detected, and DNSSEC is not enabled, representing areas for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional hardening and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Neiburgs Hotel
Description
Neiburgs is a family-owned hotel located in the heart of Riga Old Town offering 55 rooms, a restaurant, business center, conference rooms, fitness room, and SPA. The restaurant offers European cuisine with a Latvian touch using seasonal and local ingredients.
Key services
Hotel rooms and apartments, Restaurant and bar, Conference and business facilities, Fitness and SPA services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Mailchimp, jQuery (implied by daterangepicker), Owl Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Mailchimp
Marketing tools
Mailchimp
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Clear multilingual support with Latvian, English, and German versions.
  3. Comprehensive contact information including emails, phone numbers, and physical address.
  4. Cookie consent banner implemented with detailed configuration.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and TripAdvisor.
  9. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Google services for analytics and marketing.
  10. No DNSSEC enabled which is a recommended security improvement.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including Owl Carousel for image sliders, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Mailchimp for marketing automation. The HTML is well structured with proper meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. Mobile optimization is good with responsive images and layout. The site is hosted on a platform associated with GoDaddy.com, LLC, the domain registrar. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience with room for security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with neiburgs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review neiburgs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.