Skip to main content

Security report for ncv.nl

Nederlandse Coeliakie Vereniging · Healthcare · Netherlands

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Nederlandse Coeliakie Vereniging (NCV) is a well-established Dutch non-profit organization dedicated to supporting individuals who require a gluten-free diet for medical reasons, primarily coeliakie. The website serves as a comprehensive resource offering membership benefits, educational content, community engagement, and professional support including a dietitian network and a gluten-free product certification. The NCV holds a strong market position within the healthcare and non-profit sectors in the Netherlands, with a membership base of approximately 22,000 individuals. Technically, the website is built on the Procurios CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as Prototype.js, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and demonstrates good SEO practices. Privacy and cookie policies are clearly presented with an opt-in consent mechanism, reflecting compliance with GDPR requirements. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent controls but lacks explicit security headers and published incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the organization's identity. Overall, the NCV website is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with its mission. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response transparency could further enhance its security posture and stakeholder confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ncv.nl

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ncv.nl, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
20
Employees
0
Customers
20
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ncv.nl.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NCV operates as a specialized non-profit entity focused on healthcare for gluten-intolerant individuals. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive service offering including certification, community, and professional networks. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, donations, and certification fees. The target audience spans patients, healthcare professionals, and food industry stakeholders. The organization demonstrates growth through active community engagement and partnerships such as with glutenvrij.nl. The website supports these operations with clear navigation, relevant content, and digital marketing tools, positioning NCV as a trusted authority in its niche.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to strong security posture with mandatory HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., CSP, X-Frame-Options) and lack of publicly available security or incident response policies represent gaps. No signs of vulnerabilities or data leaks were found. The use of third-party tracking scripts is managed with opt-in consent, aligning with privacy regulations. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure processes are not visible, suggesting areas for improvement to meet higher security maturity levels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file, to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to reduce risk of vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging capabilities to detect and respond to security incidents promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nederlandse Coeliakie Vereniging
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nederlandse Coeliakie Vereniging
Description
De Nederlandse Coeliakie Vereniging zet zich in om het leven van mensen die om medische redenen glutenvrij moeten eten aangenamer te maken. De organisatie biedt informatie, ondersteuning, een community, activiteiten, en promoot het veilig glutenvrij keurmerk.
Key services
Lidmaatschap en ledenvoordelen, Informatie en kenniscentrum, Activiteiten en workshops, Glutenvrij keurmerk, Community platform, Advies voor professionals en horeca
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Procurios CMS, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
Prototype.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism with opt-in
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async loading for scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Tag Manager
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to the target audience.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Use of modern tracking and marketing tools with opt-in consent.
  6. Clear contact information and physical address provided.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content or domains.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Procurios CMS with JavaScript frameworks including Prototype.js. It uses asynchronous loading for analytics and marketing scripts (Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel) to optimize performance. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured content. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of assets and caching. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from updated security configurations and enhanced monitoring tools to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ncv.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ncv.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.