Skip to main content

Security report for naughtyamerica.com

La Touraine, Inc. · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Naughty America is a prominent adult entertainment company offering a wide range of premium pornographic content including HD, 4K, and VR videos. The company operates a subscription-based platform with extensive affiliate partnerships and a large content library targeting adult consumers globally. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation, legal disclaimers, and age verification mechanisms to comply with industry standards. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, New Relic monitoring, and Typekit fonts. It uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificates ensuring secure data transmission. However, some security best practices such as explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which could be improved to enhance compliance and security posture. From a security perspective, the site shows a moderate maturity level with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about transparency and trustworthiness, although this may be due to privacy protection services. The company maintains compliance with industry standards such as RTA and MasterCard requirements, but lacks publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. Overall, Naughty America presents a solid business and technical profile with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching naughtyamerica.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Naughty America holds a strong market position as a leading adult content provider with a diversified business model including subscription services, affiliate marketing, and content distribution. The company targets adult consumers seeking high-quality pornographic content across multiple formats including VR. Its partnership ecosystem includes payment processors and affiliate networks, supporting robust revenue streams. The brand is consistent and well-recognized in the adult entertainment industry, with a large content catalog and frequent updates. Growth indicators include extensive social media presence and multiple related domains supporting business operations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with enforced HTTPS and absence of exposed sensitive information. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public security policy or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency. The missing cookie consent mechanism indicates partial GDPR compliance. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected. The use of modern monitoring tools like New Relic suggests active performance and error tracking. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could benefit from enhanced controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Deploy a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and preparedness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
La Touraine, Inc.
Description
Naughty America offers daily porn movies featuring top pornstars and milfs in HD, 4K, and VR formats. It provides access to multiple porn sites, unlimited downloads, and high-resolution photos targeting adult audiences.
Key services
Porn videos in HD, 4K, VR, Membership access, Affiliate programs, Mobile and tablet support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, New Relic Browser Agent, Typekit Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-related meta tags (RTA rating)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, New Relic
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data missing, indicating privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  4. Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificates.
  5. Privacy and terms pages are present and linked in footer.
  6. No explicit cookie consent banner found.
  7. Contact support is via external support portal; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  8. Social media presence on Twitter, Instagram, Reddit.
  9. Use of modern analytics and monitoring tools (Google Analytics, New Relic).
  10. Affiliate marketing and partner sites clearly linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript technologies with integration of Google Tag Manager and New Relic for analytics and monitoring. It uses Typekit for font management and serves content over HTTPS with valid SSL certificates. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and clear navigation. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. No CMS or hosting provider details were explicitly detected. The technical infrastructure supports a large content library and affiliate marketing operations effectively, though improvements in accessibility and security headers are recommended to reduce technical debt and risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with naughtyamerica.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review naughtyamerica.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.