Skip to main content

Security report for nativendo.de

Seeding Alliance GmbH · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Seeding Alliance GmbH operates a specialized native advertising self-booking platform targeting advertisers and marketers seeking efficient campaign management solutions. The company positions itself as a flexible and user-friendly provider within the digital media sector in Germany. The website demonstrates a solid digital infrastructure built on WordPress, enhanced with SEO best practices via Yoast and consent management through Cookiebot, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security posture is robust with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though additional security headers and published policies could enhance trust further. Overall, the site is professional, accessible, and compliant with GDPR consent requirements, though explicit privacy and terms of service documentation are not evident on the analyzed page.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of nativendo.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nativendo.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention nativendo.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
21
Employees
1
Customers
20
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

Latest record dated 2026-05-28 · 2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for nativendo.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –tool.nativendo.de2026-05-28

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Seeding Alliance GmbH leverages a niche business model focused on native advertising self-service platforms, catering to a specialized market segment. Their competitive advantage lies in ease of campaign creation and integration with major ad networks like Google and Meta. The company maintains active social media channels, enhancing brand visibility and customer engagement. The absence of direct contact information on the analyzed page suggests a possible focus on digital lead generation or contact via other channels. The business ecosystem includes partnerships with major analytics and consent providers, indicating strategic alignment with industry standards.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and comprehensive cookie consent management via Cookiebot. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. The absence of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced with formalized policies and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service documents accessible from all pages.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to ensure compliance and minimize tracking risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Seeding Alliance GmbH
Description
Die flexible Native Advertising Lösung. Erstellen Sie mit unserer Self-Booking Plattform für Native Advertising mit wenigen Klicks eine Native Ads Kampagne.
Key services
Native Advertising Campaign Management, Self-Booking Platform for Native Ads
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Cookiebot, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Statista
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Google Ads, Meta Platforms (Facebook Ads)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern consent management with Cookiebot.
  2. Strong SEO implementation with Yoast and structured data.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the analyzed page.
  4. Social media presence is linked and consistent with company branding.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response information published.
  6. No terms of service or privacy policy links found on the analyzed page.
  7. Website is fully accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and consent management plugins, indicating a well-maintained technical stack. Hosting is managed via INWX nameservers, suggesting a reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with preloaded fonts and asynchronous script loading for analytics and consent tools. Mobile optimization is good, and accessibility features are basic but present. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and performance further by optimizing scripts and enhancing semantic markup. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 73/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nativendo.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nativendo.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.