Skip to main content

Is nationalreview.com a Scam? Security Check Results - National Review

nationalreview.com Security Report Summary

nationalreview.com received a security score of 67 out of 100 in Guard's comprehensive security analysis, classified as "Moderate Risk". This report covers National Review's website security posture. National Review operates in the Media industry in N/a.

National Review is a well-established conservative media outlet providing news, opinion, and cultural commentary. The website offers a variety of content including articles, podcasts, and videos targeting a conservative audience interested in politics and current events. The business model includes subscriptions and donations, positioning it as a large media entity with a consistent brand presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and various ad networks, hosted likely on Pantheon. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure user connections. Security posture is good with no critical vulnerabilities detected, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are lacking. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy-protected, which slightly reduces domain trust but does not detract from the professional appearance and content quality of the site. Overall, the site is trustworthy, content-rich, and technically sound but could improve in privacy transparency and security header implementation.

The security scan identified 29 findings across security headers, SSL/TLS, DNS health, email security, GDPR compliance, and NIS2 compliance analysis modules.

Technologies detected: WordPress 6.9, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Chartbeat, OneSignal Push Notifications, Insticator Ads, Prebid.js, DoubleClick for Publishers, Cloudfront CDN, Privacy Management Script.

About this security scan

Guard performs automated security assessments of websites by analyzing SSL/TLS certificates, HTTP security headers, DNS configuration, email authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), GDPR compliance indicators, NIS2 directive compliance, network exposure, and business-context intelligence. Each report provides domain-specific findings, risk scores, and actionable recommendations.

nationalreview.com favicon

Is nationalreview.com Safe? Security Analysis for National Review

https://www.nationalreview.com/

Check if nationalreview.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/alarge
WordPress 6.9Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelChartbeat+6 more
Analyzed Completed
67
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

Above Media avg (58)

GDPR-aligned

Data handling

EU

Hosting region

EveryPay

Secure checkout

Instant

Reports delivered

Professional Report

Unlock the full report for nationalreview.com

Professional PDF, email delivery, and optional intelligence add-ons. One-time purchase, lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

AI Summary

National Review is a well-established conservative media outlet providing news, opinion, and cultural commentary. The website offers a variety of content including articles, podcasts, and videos targeting a conservative audience interested in politics and current events. The business model includes subscriptions and donations, positioning it as a large media entity with a consistent brand presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and various ad networks, hosted likely on Pantheon. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure user connections. Security posture is good with no critical vulnerabilities detected, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are lacking. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy-protected, which slightly reduces domain trust but does not detract from the professional appearance and content quality of the site. Overall, the site is trustworthy, content-rich, and technically sound but could improve in privacy transparency and security header implementation.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.9Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelChartbeatOneSignal Push NotificationsInsticator AdsPrebid.jsDoubleClick for PublishersCloudfront CDNPrivacy Management Script

9 urgent findings need attention

9 high

  • + 1 more findings in the full report below
Continuous monitoring

Keep nationalreview.com under constant watch

Guard tracks your live infrastructure daily: certificate expiry, DNS & mail authentication drift, uptime changes, subdomain inventory, and unexpected tracker or content shifts. A full timeline captures every diff so you can prove remediation and spot regressions instantly.

Security drift alerts

Risk score drops, new high-severity issues, and header hardening gaps

Compliance watch

GDPR / NIS2 posture changes with governance evidence snapshots

Infrastructure surface

Unexpected open services, SSL expiry, DNS & email authentication changes

Content & tracker intelligence

Marketing tech shifts, analytics drift, and AI recommendation updates

25 €
per month · billed securely via EveryPay
Less than 1 € / day — cheaper than a single incident response hour

Cancel anytime. Alerts sent to the contacts you choose. Unlock the full report to view historical timelines and alerts.

Purchase to access the monitoring timeline, JSON diffs, alert history, and PDF export for nationalreview.com.

OffSeq Observations

No critical findings yet

78/100

SSL/TLS Security

5 findings

47/100

Network Security

1 finding

100/100

Email Security

5 findings

80/100

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

National Review holds a strong market position as a leading conservative news and opinion platform. Its competitive advantage lies in its established brand, loyal audience, and diversified content formats. Revenue streams likely include subscriptions, donations, and advertising. The target customer segment is politically conservative readers interested in detailed political and cultural analysis. The site integrates multiple advertising and tracking technologies, indicating a mature digital marketing ecosystem. Partnerships with major ad networks and analytics providers support its monetization and audience insights. The absence of explicit contact and privacy information suggests an area for operational improvement. The website's consistent branding and professional content support its credibility and market presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. It employs multiple third-party analytics and advertising scripts, which increases the attack surface but is common for media sites. The lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS is a gap that should be addressed to enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are found, indicating limited transparency in security management. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no clear GDPR or cookie policy pages detected, which could pose compliance risks. Overall, the site is secure but would benefit from enhanced security policies and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

Comprehensive website and business-context analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

National Review

Description:

Leading conservative magazine and website covering news, politics, current events, and culture with detailed analysis and commentary.

Key Services:
News articlesOpinion piecesPodcastsVideosSubscription servicesDonations
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.9Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelChartbeatOneSignal Push NotificationsInsticator AdsPrebid.jsDoubleClick for PublishersCloudfront CDNPrivacy Management Script
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security and analytics scripts
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsChartbeatQuantcastScorecardResearchCrazyEggFacebook PixelBing Ads
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
PubMaticRubicon ProjectGoogle AdSense/DoubleClickBounceXRevcontentDotomiPostReleaseInsticator
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelChartbeatQuantcastScorecardResearchCrazyEggBing Ads
Marketing Tools:
BlueConic
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional conservative news and opinion media outlet.

Get this report delivered to your inbox

Receive a summary of the nationalreview.com security findings by email. Quick and easy to share with decision makers.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Need this report as a PDF?

Download the complete nationalreview.com security analysis as a professional PDF. Share it with your team, clients, or stakeholders.

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:23.21.109.197 ip4:23.21.109.212 ip4:147.160.167.0/26 include:include:_spf.psm.knowbe4.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:[email protected]
Forensic Reports:[email protected]

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

47/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 39 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
30 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1809 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.20.44.236, 172.66.163.169
AAAA Records:2606:4700:10::6814:2cec, 2606:4700:10::ac42:a3a9
Name Servers:
anna.ns.cloudflare.com
norm.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2407086379, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Enabled(Algorithm: 13)

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:32ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mailgun.org include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:23.21.109.197 ip4:23.21.109.212 ip4:147.160.167.0/26 include:include:_spf.psm.knowbe4.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

How does nationalreview.com compare?

See how nationalreview.com stacks up against similar websites in the same industry.

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is powered by WordPress 6.9 and uses a variety of modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Chartbeat, and OneSignal for push notifications. Advertising is managed through multiple networks such as PubMatic, Rubicon Project, and DoubleClick. The site is hosted on Pantheon, inferred from caching scripts. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses a CDN (Cloudfront) for content delivery. Technical debt appears low, but the site could improve by implementing additional security headers and enhancing privacy transparency. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and scalable media platform.
Professional Report

Download the nationalreview.com report as PDF

Get the complete analysis in a shareable PDF format, delivered instantly to your email with lifetime access.

Optional add-ons

via BREACH

Your order

Full Report
PDF · email delivery · lifetime access
39.90
Total
Incl. 21% VAT
39.90
Already purchased? Enter unlock code
VisaMastercardApple PayGoogle Payvia EveryPay
SEQ SIA
Reg. No. 40203410806 · VAT LV40203410806

Scan your own website

Liked the nationalreview.com report? Run the same comprehensive security analysis on your domain — free, instant, and no sign-up required.

Or browse our directory of >10,000 scanned websites.

⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about nationalreview.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website