Skip to main content

Security report for nastennemapy.cz

P.F.art, spol. s r.o. · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

P.F.art, spol. s r.o. operates the e-commerce website nastennemapy.cz, specializing in the sale of wall maps and related cartographic products primarily for homes, offices, and educational institutions in the Czech Republic. The company offers a diverse product range including laminated, framed, tourist, plastic, and children's maps, supported by additional services such as lamination and framing. The website demonstrates a consistent brand presence and clear business information, positioning itself as a niche leader in the Czech map retail market. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Seznam Retargeting, with responsive design and good SEO practices. However, some security best practices such as explicit security headers are missing, and the WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. The site uses HTTPS and provides cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a basic level of privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site shows moderate maturity with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response contact is noted. The domain's WHOIS information is missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation to confirm legitimacy. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and trustworthy for general audiences. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing a security policy, establishing a vulnerability disclosure process, and verifying domain registration details to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nastennemapy.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a specialized retail segment focused on cartographic products, serving customers such as households, schools, offices, and tourists. Its business model centers on direct online sales supported by value-added services like lamination and framing. The company leverages partnerships with payment processors like Comgate and web development services from WebProgress. Market positioning is strong within the Czech Republic niche, with a focus on quality and variety. Growth potential exists through expanding product lines and improving digital marketing. The absence of WHOIS data is a minor risk factor but does not currently impact operational credibility.

Security posture

The website maintains a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security risks are low but can be mitigated by adopting recommended best practices and improving transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve domain trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user data handling practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
P.F.art, spol. s r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
P.F.art, spol. s r.o.
Description
E-shop NástěnnéMapy.cz se specializuje především na prodej nástěnných map z vlastní produkce, ale také od renomovaných kartografických společností. Nabízí mapy světa, Evropy, Česka a dalších regionů, včetně turistických, plastických, dětských map a podložek na stůl.
Key services
Prodej nástěnných map, Turistické mapy, Plastické mapy, Dětské mapy, Podložky na stůl, Laminování, Rámování
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Seznam Retargeting
Frameworks
Modernizr
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel, Seznam Retargeting
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Seznam Retargeting
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and e-commerce functionality.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided and consistent with business identity.
  5. Use of multiple tracking and advertising technologies with moderate user tracking.
  6. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source; potential area for improvement.
  7. No evidence of adult or questionable content; site is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Modernizr, and integrates multiple third-party analytics and advertising services such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Seznam Retargeting. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization information. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS is explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available. The site could benefit from improved accessibility features and implementation of security headers to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nastennemapy.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nastennemapy.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.