Skip to main content

Security report for nasledna-pece.cz

Medicon Hospitals s.r.o. · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.nasledna-pece.cz represents Medicon Hospitals s.r.o., a healthcare provider specializing in follow-up and home healthcare services in the Czech Republic. The site targets clients of all age groups requiring professional medical care in their homes or in specialized clinics. The business model focuses on delivering comprehensive healthcare services including long-term care (LDN) and home care, supported by a professional and compassionate medical staff. The company maintains a medium-sized presence with a consistent brand image and positive client testimonials enhancing trustworthiness. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar for analytics and user experience enhancement. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. Privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented effectively, reflecting a good level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and uses consent management for tracking scripts, but lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, but the professional content and business information support a positive security posture. Overall, the website is well-structured, professional, and trustworthy with room for improvement in security header implementation and transparency around security policies. The domain's missing WHOIS data is a concern that should be addressed to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nasledna-pece.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
80
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Medicon Hospitals s.r.o. operates in the healthcare sector, providing specialized follow-up and home care services. The company leverages a client-centric approach with a focus on quality care and patient satisfaction, as evidenced by detailed testimonials. Their business model likely includes partnerships with healthcare institutions and direct client services. The website's content and structure suggest a stable market position within the Czech healthcare market. The presence of a parent company (Medicon a.s.) indicates integration within a larger healthcare group. The company uses digital tools for marketing and analytics, indicating an awareness of modern business practices. Growth potential exists through expanding home care services and enhancing digital engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent management that defaults to denying ad and analytics storage until consent is given. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security robustness. No direct evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data was found. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness communication. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by the presence of a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers and publishing security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices, data protection measures, and incident response procedures to increase transparency and trust.
  3. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable dependencies.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Medicon Hospitals s.r.o.
Description
Zajišťujeme odbornou zdravotní péči pro klienty všech věkových skupin v jejich domácím prostředí a v rámci následné péče (LDN).
Key services
Následná péče (Follow-up care), Domácí péče (Home care)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery 2.2.4, Google Fonts (Roboto, Open Sans), Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, FancyBox, CookieConsent v2.7.2, WOW.js, jPushMenu
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with default denial of ad and analytics storage
  • Google Tag Manager with consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and has good privacy and cookie consent implementations.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information is provided.
  5. Contact information is present but no direct email addresses found in HTML content.
  6. Business appears to be a healthcare provider operating in Czech Republic with a medium-sized presence.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Good use of client testimonials as trust indicators.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a solid foundation using Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery 2.2.4, which are somewhat dated but still widely supported. It integrates Google Fonts for typography and uses Google Tag Manager and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site loads external CSS and JS from reputable CDNs, contributing to performance and reliability. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are properly configured. However, the use of older jQuery and Bootstrap versions may pose some technical debt and potential security risks. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site build. Performance is moderate, with opportunities to improve load times and accessibility compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nasledna-pece.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nasledna-pece.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.