Skip to main content

Security report for napec.app

NAPEC · Energy · Algeria

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

NAPEC is a professional event organizer focused on the energy sector, specifically hosting the Africa & Mediterranean Energy & Hydrogen Exhibition and Conference scheduled for October 2025 in Oran, Algeria. The website serves as a portal for attendee registration, information dissemination, and sponsor promotion, targeting energy and hydrocarbons professionals. The business model revolves around event participation fees, sponsorships, and exhibition opportunities. Technically, the website is built on Angular with modern libraries and integrates a consent management platform and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile optimized and presents a professional design with clear navigation. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain protections in place, though improvements such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism present but lacking detailed GDPR indicators. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with no signs of malicious activity or content safety concerns.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching napec.app

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
92
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

NAPEC positions itself as a key regional event in the energy sector, leveraging partnerships with major industry players like Sonatrach and Schlumberger. Its competitive advantage lies in its focused niche on energy and hydrogen, attracting professionals and companies in these fields. The business model is event-driven, generating revenue through delegate passes, exhibitor fees, and sponsorships. The target customers are energy professionals, exhibitors, sponsors, and media representatives. Growth indicators include the recent domain registration aligned with the event timeline and the use of modern digital tools for engagement. The partnership ecosystem is evident through sponsor logos and supported-by mentions. Strategic observations suggest continued investment in digital presence and security enhancements to maintain trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections that prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The use of Usercentrics CMP shows awareness of privacy and consent management. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Compliance with GDPR is basic but could be enhanced with clearer data protection officer contact and detailed privacy practices. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an event website but should be strengthened to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance GDPR compliance by providing detailed privacy practices and data protection officer contact details.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to proactively identify and mitigate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NAPEC
Description
NAPEC is an event focused on accelerating tomorrow’s energy and achieving an efficient energy mix through partnerships, investment, innovation, and technology. It is an Africa & Mediterranean Energy & Hydrogen Exhibition and Conference scheduled for 06-08 October 2025 in Oran, Algeria.
Key services
Conference sessions, Exhibitions, Sponsorship opportunities, Attendee and visitor registration, Media registration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 14.2.12, jQuery 3.4.1, Font Awesome 4.7.0, Boxicons 2.1.4, Usercentrics Consent Management Platform, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited and ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management Platform
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional event portal for NAPEC 2025 energy conference.
  2. Content is well structured with clear navigation and relevant information.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and consent management platform.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. Contact information and legal documents are provided.
  6. No security policy or incident response information found.
  7. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  8. Domain registration is consistent and appropriate for the business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 14.2.12, supplemented by jQuery and icon libraries such as Font Awesome and Boxicons. It integrates Usercentrics for cookie consent management and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The hosting and DNS are managed via Squarespace Domains and Google Domains respectively. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and responsive design for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is basic with meta viewport and title tags but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. The site uses modern web standards but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and SEO practices. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or framework-based build. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but has opportunities for modernization and optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with napec.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review napec.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.