Skip to main content

Security report for nanox.vision

Nanox · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nanox is a healthcare technology company specializing in advanced medical imaging solutions and AI-powered diagnostic tools. Their flagship products include the FDA-cleared Nanox.ARC 3D tomosynthesis imaging system and Nanox.AI suite of diagnostic solutions targeting chronic diseases. The company operates a cloud-based platform (Nanox.MARKETPLACE) to connect imaging providers globally and offers OEM components and radiology services. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and mobile optimization. Technically, it is built on WordPress with modern libraries and integrates Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for security and analytics. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and spam protection, though security headers and explicit incident response policies are absent. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, Nanox presents a credible and trustworthy business with a focus on innovation in healthcare imaging technology.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching nanox.vision

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
95
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Nanox positions itself as an innovative player in the healthcare technology sector, leveraging AI and next-generation imaging hardware to disrupt traditional diagnostic methods. Their business model combines product sales, platform services, and radiology offerings, targeting healthcare providers and institutions globally. The presence of investor relations and client portals indicates a structured corporate environment. Partnerships with recognized entities and FDA clearance claims enhance competitive advantage. The company targets clinical and business segments, emphasizing early diagnosis and improved patient outcomes. Growth indicators include recent content updates and active media presence. Strategic collaborations with technology and healthcare organizations support their ecosystem expansion.

Security posture

Nanox exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforcement and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam and abuse. The absence of exposed sensitive data and the use of reputable third-party services contribute positively. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represents an area for improvement. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could impact transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is implied via privacy policies and cookie consent, but no dedicated security framework certifications or vulnerability disclosure programs are evident. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with formal policies and technical headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nanox
Description
Nanox offers advanced diagnostic imaging solutions including FDA-cleared digital multi-source 3D tomosynthesis imaging system (Nanox.ARC) and AI-powered diagnostic solutions (Nanox.AI) to improve patient care and global health equity.
Key services
Nanox.ARC imaging system, Nanox.AI diagnostic solutions, Nanox.MARKETPLACE platform, OEM components, Radiology services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, YouTube iframe API, AOS (Animate On Scroll) library, Slick carousel
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for script management
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Strong focus on medical imaging technology and AI solutions
  3. Multiple forms use Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection
  4. Social media and investor relations links present
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed
  6. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection
  7. Good SEO and metadata implementation
  8. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and linked
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform with up-to-date versions of jQuery and other JavaScript libraries such as AOS for animations and Slick for carousels. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tag management, and Google reCAPTCHA protects forms. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external CDNs for fonts and scripts. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and engaging user experience but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with nanox.vision. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review nanox.vision.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.