Skip to main content

Security report for namejarezidence.lv

Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Nameja Rezidence' represents a real estate development project located in Āgenskalns, Latvia. It showcases architectural and construction craftsmanship, targeting potential property buyers or investors interested in residential projects. The site is built on WordPress and integrates modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity for analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The presence of Calendly indicates an intent to facilitate appointment scheduling or customer engagement. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented; however, the absence of explicit privacy policy and security headers suggests room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. The lack of accessible WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy and registrant details, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the site is professionally designed with good content quality and user experience, suitable for its real estate market audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching namejarezidence.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to be a small-scale real estate developer or project promoter focusing on residential properties in Latvia. The website content and metadata emphasize architectural quality and location appeal, targeting local or regional buyers. The business model likely revolves around property sales or leasing. The use of third-party services like Calendly and analytics tools suggests a customer-centric approach with data-driven marketing. No direct contact information or detailed company credentials are provided, which could be a limitation for trust-building. The site does not reveal parent company or subsidiaries, indicating an independent or standalone project. The marketing ecosystem includes Google and Microsoft advertising platforms, enhancing reach and lead generation. Strategic partnerships or payment processors are not evident from the data.

Security posture

Security measures include HTTPS encryption and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security or incident response policies are published on the site, and no contact channels for security incidents are visible. The site uses several third-party scripts which should be regularly audited to mitigate supply chain risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The WHOIS data unavailability restricts full domain trust assessment. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and providing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general inquiries and security incidents.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to enhance transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to minimize security risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Nameja Rezidence - arhitekta un būvnieku meistarības sakausējums ir Āgenskalna apkaimes jaunā pērle. Nameja Rezidence - ir mājas ar dabas elpu pilsētā
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, FormCraft, Page Flip JS, Lightbox2, Calendly Widget
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Microsoft Clarity, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM), Cookiebot tracking
Marketing tools
Calendly
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based real estate project site in Latvia.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Multiple external scripts and trackers are used including Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is fully accessible.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  8. Site uses HTTPS and has favicon and SEO meta tags properly configured.
  9. No security headers detected in the provided data; recommend adding for improved security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS version 6.8.2, utilizing jQuery and several plugins including FormCraft for forms, Cookiebot for cookie consent, and external widgets like Calendly. The site loads multiple external resources from trusted CDNs and service providers. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data, enhancing social media sharing. Performance appears moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and prefetching of DNS for external domains. Mobile optimization is good with responsive meta viewport and CSS. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and semantic HTML elements. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were observed. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and adequate for the business purpose.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with namejarezidence.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review namejarezidence.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.