Skip to main content

Security report for naircare.com

Church & Dwight Co., Inc. · Retail · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nair™ is a well-established brand specializing in hair removal products including creams, waxes, and depilatories, targeting a broad consumer audience. The website positions itself as a leading brand with over 80 years of expertise, offering a variety of products and educational content to support consumer needs. The parent company is Church & Dwight Co., Inc., a large retail entity. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and integrates marketing and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Bazaarvoice. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but the overall brand trust and content quality remain strong. Strategic improvements in security posture and transparency would enhance trust further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching naircare.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as a direct consumer engagement platform for Nair™, a brand under Church & Dwight Co., Inc. It leverages social media and third-party marketing tools to maintain market presence. The business model is retail-focused, selling hair removal products with educational content to support customer decision-making. The site’s integration with Salesforce Live Agent chat indicates investment in customer support. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels. The domain WHOIS absence is unusual for a large brand and may warrant monitoring. Overall, the company maintains a strong market position with consistent branding and a comprehensive product offering.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which limits transparency in security management. The use of multiple third-party scripts requires ongoing vigilance to prevent supply chain risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the content. Enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program would improve the security maturity and trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Provide direct company contact information for security and general inquiries to improve transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
Description
Nair™ Hair Remover products help provide smooth, stunning skin for all people and all parts of the body, without the hassle of shaving. Developed by hair removal experts with over 80 years of experience, offering multitasking formulas for hair-free skin that lasts longer than shaving.
Key services
Hair removal creams, Wax products, Depilatory products, Product education and guides
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Bazaarvoice, Salesforce Embedded Service Chat, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Cludo Search
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Salesforce Live Agent Chat
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Embedded Salesforce chat with asynchronous loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Bing UET
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Bing UET, Bazaarvoice
Marketing tools
Cludo Search
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a .com domain and reduces transparency.
  3. Strong brand presence with consistent branding and social media integration.
  4. Good privacy and cookie policies linked to parent company domain.
  5. Use of multiple third-party scripts and marketing tools with asynchronous loading.
  6. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the main site; contact is via form.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with jQuery, Bootstrap, and Slick Carousel for UI components, supported by Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tag management. It integrates Salesforce Live Agent for chat support and OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading, but some legacy libraries like jQuery 3.1.1 and Bootstrap 4.5.0 are used alongside newer versions, suggesting potential technical debt. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and canonical links. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional e-commerce presence with room for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with naircare.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review naircare.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.