Skip to main content

Security report for mzirafos.lt

Miesto Žirafos · Media · Lithuania

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Miesto Žirafos is a Lithuanian media platform focused on providing comprehensive event listings and entertainment guides for major cities such as Vilnius, Kaunas, and Klaipėda. The website targets residents and visitors interested in local cultural events, festivals, and leisure activities. It offers advertising opportunities and a mobile app for convenient event calendar management. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and integrates Google services like Analytics and Adsense, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and uses structured data for SEO benefits. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, although the website content and social media presence suggest legitimacy. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism but no clear privacy policy page. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching mzirafos.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
25
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
55
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche as a regional event and entertainment guide in Lithuania, leveraging local city-specific content to attract users. Its business model includes content provision, event submissions, and advertising revenue. Partnerships with related news sites and BalticApp indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The site has been operational since at least 2016, suggesting some market presence and user base. Growth potential exists through enhanced mobile app adoption and expanded advertising. Competitive advantages include localized content and a user-friendly event calendar. However, the lack of detailed company registration and WHOIS transparency may affect business credibility in some contexts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, it lacks key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. The WordPress CMS and plugins require regular updates to prevent vulnerabilities. No explicit incident response or security policy information is available, indicating limited transparency in security governance. GDPR compliance is partial, with cookie consent but no clear privacy policy. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with better headers, documented policies, and vulnerability management.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish and disclose an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.
  5. Enhance transparency around data protection practices and consider appointing a Data Protection Officer.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Miesto Žirafos
Description
Susiplanuok ką veikti patogiai: renginiai, pramogos, koncertai, laisvalaikis; restoranai, barai, teatrai, klubai ir jų programos išsamiai. Sužinok kas vyksta Vilniuje, Kaune ir Klaipėdoje, nepraleisk didžiausių ir svarbiausių įvykių, susikurk savo patogų pramogų ir renginių kalendorių mobilioje programėlėje.
Key services
Event listings, Entertainment guides, Advertising services, Mobile app for event calendar
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.3, Bootstrap 3.3.7, jQuery 1.12.4, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google Adsense, Yoast SEO plugin, Lightbox PhotoSwipe
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form submission via HTTPS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and event listings
  2. Uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificate
  3. No WHOIS data available due to domain WHOIS query failure
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage
  6. Social media presence is active with official Facebook, Instagram, YouTube links
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google services
  8. No obvious security vulnerabilities detected in HTML content
  9. Advertising is primarily via Google Adsense
  10. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature and widely supported technology stack centered on WordPress 5.3 and Bootstrap 3.3.7, with jQuery 1.12.4 for client-side scripting. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for design and analytics respectively. The site is mobile responsive and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external scripts and ads. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is room for modernization by upgrading WordPress and Bootstrap versions and optimizing script loading. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with mzirafos.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review mzirafos.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.